Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28566752›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Metabolomics biomarkers to predict acamprosate treatment response in alcohol-dependent subjects.

David J Hinton, Marely Santiago Vázquez, Jennifer R Geske, Mario J Hitschfeld, Ada M C Ho, Victor M Karpyak, Joanna M Biernacka, Doo-Sup Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. RNA biomarkers for alcohol use disorder.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Possible Benefit and Validity of Supplements for Alcohol Use Disorder.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David J HintonDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, USA.
Marely Santiago VázquezDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, USA.
Jennifer R GeskeDepartment of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, USA.
Mario J HitschfeldPsychiatry and Mental Health Service, Sotero Del Rio Hospital, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-1422-1309
Ada M C HoDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4989-8782
Victor M KarpyakDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, USA.
Joanna M BiernackaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, USA. biernacka.joanna@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9350-4440
Doo-Sup ChoiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, USA. choids@mayo.edu.

Funding

TECHNOLOGY NMR SPECTROSCOPYU24DK100469 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI NAIR, K SREEKUMARAN · 2013 to 2017
$9.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK100469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision medicine for alcohol use disorder (AUD) allows optimal treatment of the right patient with the right drug at the right time. Here, we generated multivariable models incorporating clinical information and serum metabolite levels to predict acamprosate treatment response. The sample of 120 patients was randomly split into a training set (n = 80) and test set (n = 40) five independent times. Treatment response was defined as complete abstinence (no alcohol consumption during 3 months of acamprosate treatment) while nonresponse was defined as any alcohol consumption during this period. In each of the five training sets, we built a predictive model using a least absolute shrinkage and section operator (LASSO) penalized selection method and then evaluated the predictive performance of each model in the corresponding test set. The models predicted acamprosate treatment response with a mean sensitivity and specificity in the test sets of 0.83 and 0.31, respectively, suggesting our model performed well at predicting responders, but not non-responders (i.e. many non-responders were predicted to respond). Studies with larger sample sizes and additional biomarkers will expand the clinical utility of predictive algorithms for pharmaceutical response in AUD.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsAcamprosateAdultAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrecision MedicineTreatment OutcomeAcamprosateBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID28566752
PMCPMC5451388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.