Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28566514›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2017

Modelling human skull growth: a validated computational model.

Joseph Libby, Arsalan Marghoub, David Johnson, Roman H Khonsari, Michael J Fagan, Mehran Moazen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Is a standardised severity index needed in unicoronal craniosynostosis? Challenges in developing an objective metric.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. A preliminary analysis of replicating the biomechanics of helmet therapy for sagittal craniosynostosis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph LibbyMedical and Biological Engineering, School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3369-3400
Arsalan MarghoubUCL Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, UK.
David JohnsonOxford Craniofacial Unit, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Roman H KhonsariAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants Malades, Service de Chirurgie Maxillofaciale et Plastique & Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Michael J FaganMedical and Biological Engineering, School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.
Mehran MoazenUCL Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, UK mehran_moazen@yahoo.com m.moazen@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBUniversity of Hull · GBHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E014259/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H011668/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the first year of life, the brain grows rapidly and the neurocranium increases to about 65% of its adult size. Our understanding of the relationship between the biomechanical forces, especially from the growing brain, the craniofacial soft tissue structures and the individual bone plates of the skull vault is still limited. This basic knowledge could help in the future planning of craniofacial surgical operations. The aim of this study was to develop a validated computational model of skull growth, based on the finite-element (FE) method, to help understand the biomechanics of skull growth. To do this, a two-step validation study was carried out. First, an

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansInfantInfant, NewbornReproducibility of ResultsSkullSoftwarefinite elementhuman skull growthmodel validation

Identifiers

PMID28566514
PMCPMC5454308
OpenAlexW2618642049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.