Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28566365›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Exploring an adapted Risk Behaviour Diagnosis Scale among Indigenous Australian women who had experiences of smoking during pregnancy: a cross-sectional survey in regional New South Wales, Australia.

Gillian Sandra Gould, Michelle Bovill, Simon Chiu, Billie Bonevski, Christopher Oldmeadow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gillian Sandra GouldCentre for Brain and Mental Health Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Michelle BovillCentre for Brain and Mental Health Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Simon ChiuClinical Research Design, Information Technology and Statistical Support, Hunter Medical Research Institute, 1/1 Kookaburra Circuit, New South Wales, Australia.
Billie BonevskiCentre for Brain and Mental Health Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Christopher OldmeadowClinical Research Design, Information Technology and Statistical Support, Hunter Medical Research Institute, 1/1 Kookaburra Circuit, New South Wales, Australia.
University of Newcastle Australia · AUHunter Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesExplore Aboriginal women's responses to an adapted Risk Behaviour Diagnosis (RBD) Scale about smoking in pregnancy. METHODS AND

designAn Aboriginal researcher interviewed women and completed a cross-sectional survey including 20 Likert scales.

settingAboriginal Community Controlled Health Services, community groups and playgroups and Aboriginal Maternity Services in regional New South Wales, Australia.

participantsAboriginal women (n=20) who were pregnant or gave birth in the preceding 18 months; included if they had experiences of smoking or quitting during pregnancy. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes: RBD constructs of perceived threat and perceived efficacy, dichotomised into high versus low. Women who had quit smoking, answered retrospectively. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: smoking status, intentions to quit smoking (danger control), protection responses (to babies/others) and fear control responses (denial/refutation). Scales were assessed for internal consistency. A chart plotted responses from low to high efficacy and low to high threat.

resultsRBD Scales had moderate-to-good consistency (0.67-0.89 Cronbach's alpha). Nine women had quit and 11 were smoking; 6 currently pregnant and 14 recently pregnant. Mean efficacy level 3.9 (SD=0.7); mean threat 4.3 (SD=0.7). On inspection, a scatter plot revealed a cluster of 12 women in the high efficacy-high threat quadrant-of these 11 had quit or had a high intention of quitting. Conversely, a group with low threat-low efficacy (5 women) were all smokers and had high fear control responses: of these, 4 had low protection responses. Pregnant women had a non-significant trend for higher threat and lower efficacy, than those previously pregnant.

conclusionFindings were consistent with a previously validated RBD Scale showing Aboriginal smokers with high efficacy-high threat had greater intentions to quit smoking. The RBD Scale could have diagnostic potential to tailor health messages. Longitudinal research required with a larger sample to explore associations with the RBD Scale and quitting.

Indexed as

Health Risk BehaviorsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIntentionMiddle AgedNew South WalesPregnancySmokingSmoking CessationYoung AdultIndigenous populationsmaternal smokingpregnancyrisk assessmentrisk behaviourtobacco smoking

Identifiers

PMID28566365
PMCPMC5729996
OpenAlexW2618822423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.