Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28566363›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Randomised healthcare policy evaluation of organised primary human papillomavirus screening of women aged 56-60.

Helena Lamin, Carina Eklund, Klara Miriam Elfström, Agneta Carlsten-Thor, Maria Hortlund, Kristina Elfgren, Sven Törnberg, Joakim Dillner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01511328 (Randomized Implementation of Primary Human Papillomavirus), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01511328 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Randomized Implementation of Primary Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Testing in the Organized Screening for Cervical Cancer in Stockholm

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2012 to 2031Enrolled270,000ConditionsHigh-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Invasive Cervical CancerArmsHPV testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. HrHPV testing vs liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer screening among women aged 50 and older: a prospective study.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helena LaminDepartment of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carina EklundDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Klara Miriam ElfströmDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Agneta Carlsten-ThorCancer Screening Unit, Regional Cancer Center, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria HortlundDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kristina ElfgrenDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sven TörnbergCancer Screening Unit, Regional Cancer Center, Stockholm, Sweden.
Joakim DillnerDepartment of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this research is to implement and reliably evaluate primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in an established and routinely running organised, large-scale population-based screening programme.

participantsResident women in the Stockholm/Gotland region of Sweden, aged 56-60 years were randomised to either (1) screening with cervical cytology, with HPV test in triage of low-grade cytological abnormalities (old policy) or (2) screening with HPV testing, with cytology in triage of HPV positives (new policy). OUTCOME: The primary evaluation was the detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+).

resultsDuring January 2012-May 2014, the organised screening programme sent 42 752 blinded invitations with a prebooked appointment time to the women in the target age group. 7325 women attended in the HPV policy arm and 7438 women attended in the cytology arm. In the new policy, the population HPV prevalence was 5.5%, using an accredited HPV test (Cobas 4800). HPV16 prevalence was 1.0% (73/7325) and HPV18 prevalence was 0.3% (22/7325). In the HPV policy arm, 78/405 (19%) HPV-positive women were also cytology positive. There were 19 cases of CIN2+ in histopathology, all among women who were both HPV positive and cytology positive. The positive predictive value for CIN2+ in this group was 33.3% (19/57). In the cytology policy, 153 women were cytology positive and there were 18 cases of CIN2+ in histopathology. Both the total number of cervical biopsies and the number of cervical biopsies with benign histopathology were much lower in thepositive predictive value policy (49 benign, 87 total vs 105 benign, 132 total).

conclusionPrimary HPV screening had a similar detection rate for CIN2+ as cytology-based screening, already before follow-up of HPV-positive, cytology-negative women with new HPV test and referral of women with persistence. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01511328.

Indexed as

AdultBiopsyCervix UteriEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth PolicyHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPredictive Value of TestsPrevalenceReferral and ConsultationSwedencervical cancerHPV primary screeningorganised screening programme

Identifiers

PMID28566363
PMCPMC5729984
OpenAlexW2617666761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.