Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28566331›Full record

ArticleCancer research2017

Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interactions Determine Optimum Combination Strategies in Computational Models of Cancer Evolution.

Shaon Chakrabarti, Franziska Michor

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Reinforcement learning informs optimal treatment strategies to limit antibiotic resistance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dissecting sources of variability in patient response to targeted therapy: anti-HER2 therapies as a case study.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shaon ChakrabartiDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Franziska MichorDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. michor@jimmy.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · US

Funding

The Cell-Of-Origin of Human CancersU54CA143798 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI MICHOR, FRANZISKA · 2009 to 2014
$11.2M
Project 3: Single Cell Measures of Intratumor Diversity for Optimal Breast Cancer TherapyU54CA193461 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI MICHOR, FRANZISKA · 2015 to 2020
$11.2M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143798NCI NIH HHS U54 CA193461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of optimal drug administration schedules to battle the emergence of resistance is a major challenge in cancer research. The existence of a multitude of resistance mechanisms necessitates administering drugs in combination, significantly complicating the endeavor of predicting the evolutionary dynamics of cancers and optimal intervention strategies. A thorough understanding of the important determinants of cancer evolution under combination therapies is therefore crucial for correctly predicting treatment outcomes. Here we developed the first computational strategy to explore pharmacokinetic and drug interaction effects in evolutionary models of cancer progression, a crucial step towards making clinically relevant predictions. We found that incorporating these phenomena into our multiscale stochastic modeling framework significantly changes the optimum drug administration schedules identified, often predicting nonintuitive strategies for combination therapies. We applied our approach to an ongoing phase Ib clinical trial (TATTON) administering AZD9291 and selumetinib to EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients. Our results suggest that the schedules used in the three trial arms have almost identical efficacies, but slight modifications in the dosing frequencies of the two drugs can significantly increase tumor cell eradication. Interestingly, we also predict that drug concentrations lower than the MTD are as efficacious, suggesting that lowering the total amount of drug administered could lower toxicities while not compromising on the effectiveness of the drugs. Our approach highlights the fact that quantitative knowledge of pharmacokinetic, drug interaction, and evolutionary processes is essential for identifying best intervention strategies. Our method is applicable to diverse cancer and treatment types and allows for a rational design of clinical trials.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAcrylamidesAniline CompoundsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzimidazolesClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicComputer SimulationDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleDrug InteractionsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansIndolesLung NeoplasmsNeoplasmsPyrimidinesAcrylamidesAniline CompoundsAZD 6244BenzimidazolesIndolesosimertinibPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID28566331
PMCPMC5553595
OpenAlexW2618035748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.