Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28566095›Full record

SynthesisPublic health nutrition2017

Health-related outcomes of new grocery store interventions: a systematic review.

Am Hasanthi Abeykoon, Rachel Engler-Stringer, Nazeem Muhajarine

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Equipping perinatal teams to practice climate-smart healthcare.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Association of Food Desert Residency and Preterm Birth in the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Associations between the built environment and dietary intake, physical activity, and obesity: A scoping review of reviews.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Am Hasanthi Abeykoon1Department of Community Health and Epidemiology,College of Medicine,Health Sciences Building,University of Saskatchewan,107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon,SK,Canada,S7N 5E5.
Rachel Engler-Stringer1Department of Community Health and Epidemiology,College of Medicine,Health Sciences Building,University of Saskatchewan,107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon,SK,Canada,S7N 5E5.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1976-1339
Nazeem Muhajarine1Department of Community Health and Epidemiology,College of Medicine,Health Sciences Building,University of Saskatchewan,107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon,SK,Canada,S7N 5E5.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the evidence of the impact of new food store (supermarket/grocery store) interventions on selected health-related outcomes.

designA systematic review following the Effective Public Health Practice Project guidelines. All quantitative studies were assessed for their methodological quality. Results were synthesized narratively.

settingEight electronic databases - MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ProQuest Public Health, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library - were searched to identify relevant records. SUBJECTS: Peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles on new grocery store/supermarket interventions with adult study populations, published in the English language after 1995.

resultsEleven records representing seven new grocery store interventions were identified. Six were assessed having 'weak' methodological quality, one as 'moderate' and two as 'strong'. All studies reported fruit and vegetable consumption but results were not consistent, some studies reporting significantly more and others no increase in consumption. BMI and self-rated health did not show significant improvements. Perceptions of food access, neighbourhood satisfaction and psychological health showed significant improvements.

conclusionsImproved food access through establishment of a full-service food retailer, by itself, does not show strong evidence towards enhancing health-related outcomes over short durations. Presently the field is developing and the complex linking pathways/mechanisms are yet to be elucidated. Further evidence, in the form of high-quality research in different communities with longer follow-up periods, is needed to inform policy decisions.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorFood SupplyHealth BehaviorPublic HealthAdultDiet, HealthyFood PreferencesHumansObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResidence CharacteristicsSocial EnvironmentDisadvantaged neighbourhoodsHealth outcomesPolicyPopulation health interventionsRetail food environment

Identifiers

PMID28566095
PMCPMC10261475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.