Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28566090›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2017

Lymphatic delivery of etanercept via nanotopography improves response to collagen-induced arthritis.

Melissa B Aldrich, Fred C Velasquez, Sunkuk Kwon, Ali Azhdarinia, Kenneth Pinkston, Barrett R Harvey, Wenyaw Chan, John C Rasmussen, Russell F Ross, Caroline E Fife and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Above the Matrix: Functional Roles for Apically Localized Integrins.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Fluctuations in Pharmacokinetics Profiles of Monoclonal Antibodies.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa B AldrichThe Center for Molecular Imaging, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Fred C VelasquezThe Center for Molecular Imaging, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Sunkuk KwonThe Center for Molecular Imaging, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Ali AzhdariniaThe Center for Molecular Imaging, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Kenneth PinkstonThe Center for Molecular Imaging, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Barrett R HarveyThe Center for Molecular Imaging, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Wenyaw ChanDepartment of Biostatistics, The School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
John C RasmussenThe Center for Molecular Imaging, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Russell F RossKimberly Clark Corporation, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Caroline E FifeThe Wound Care Clinic, CHI St. Luke's Health, The Woodlands Hospital, The Woodlands, TX, 77382, USA.
E M Sevick-MuracaThe Center for Molecular Imaging, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Eva.Sevick@uth.tmc.edu.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USBrown Foundation · USKimberly-Clark (United States) · US

Funding

Lymphatic and systemic immunity changes in post-radiation lymphedema developmentR01CA201487 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ALDRICH, MELISSA B · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
Functional lymph angiography with NIR imagingR01HL092923 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI SEVICK, EVA M. · 2008 to 2011
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA201487NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL092923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence suggests lymphatic function mediates local rheumatoid arthritis (RA) flares. Yet biologics that target the immune system are dosed systemically via the subcutaneous (SC) administration route, thereby inefficiently reaching local lymphatic compartments. Nanotopography has previously been shown to disrupt tight cellular junctions, potentially enhancing local lymphatic delivery and potentially improving overall therapeutic efficacy.

methodWe first characterized nanotopography (SOFUSA™) delivery of an anti-TNF drug, etanercept, by comparing pharmacokinetic profiles to those obtained by conventional SC, intravenous (IV), and intradermal (ID) routes of administration, and assessed uptake of radiolabeled etanercept in draining lymph nodes (LNs) in single dosing studies. We then compared etanercept efficacy in a progressive rat model of collagen-induced arthritis (CIA), administered systemically via SC route of administration; via the regional lymphatics through ID delivery; or through a nanotopography (SOFUSA™) device at 10, 12, and 14 days post CIA induction. Measurements of hind limb swelling and near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging of afferent lymph pumping function and reflux were conducted on days 11, 13, and 18 post CIA induction and compared to untreated CIA animals. Univariate and multivariate analysis of variance were used to compare the group differences for percentage swelling and lymphatic contractile activity.

resultsEven though all three modes of administration delivered an equal amount of etanercept, SOFUSA™ delivery resulted in increased lymphatic pumping and significantly reduced swelling as compared to untreated, ID, and SC groups. Pharmacokinetic profiles in serum and LN uptake studies showed that using the nanotopography device resulted in the greatest uptake and retention in draining LNs.

conclusionsLocoregional lymphatic delivery of biologics that target the immune system may have more favorable pharmacodynamics than SC or IV administration. Nanotopography may provide a more efficient method for delivery of anti-TNF drugs to reverse impairment of lymphatic function and reduce swelling associated with RA flares.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, ExperimentalArthritis, RheumatoidDrug Delivery SystemsEtanerceptMaleNanotechnologyRatsRats, Inbred LewAntirheumatic AgentsEtanerceptDelivery systemsEtanerceptLymphatic pumping functionNanotopographyNear-infrared fluorescence lymphatic imagingRoute of administration

Identifiers

PMID28566090
PMCPMC5452411
OpenAlexW2618889580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.