Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28566087›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2017

Development and evaluation of an "emergency access button" in Danish out-of-hours primary care: a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

J F Ebert, L Huibers, F K Lippert, B Christensen, M B Christensen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02572115 (Differentiated Access to Out-of-hours Primary Care Through Emergency Access), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02572115 nacompletednot on this map

Differentiated Access to Out-of-hours Primary Care Through Emergency Access

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2017 to 2017Enrolled7,385ConditionsAfter-hours CareArmsAkutknappen - used, Akutknappen - not used
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Do callers to out-of-hours care misuse an option to jump the phone queue?Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2019
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J F EbertSection for General Medical Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. jonasebert@ph.au.dk.
L HuibersSection for General Medical Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
F K LippertEmergency Medical Services Copenhagen, The Capital Region of Denmark, Telegrafvej 5, DK-2750, Ballerup, Copenhagen, Denmark.
B ChristensenSection for General Medical Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
M B ChristensenSection for General Medical Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOut-of-hours (OOH) health care for acute medical problems is often challenged by long waiting time for callers in need of advice and triage. Allowing patients to bypass the OOH telephone waiting line may increase patient satisfaction and provide them with a feeling of safety. We aimed to develop an "emergency access button" enabling patients to bypass the normal telephone waiting line in out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC) if they perceive their condition to be critical and to evaluate the effect of introducing the button in terms of patient satisfaction and their feeling of safety.

methodsAll patients calling the OOH-PC in two different Danish health care regions during three months will be included in this randomized controlled trial. Data will be collected through two questionnaires developed for this study: a pop-up questionnaire on the relevance of bypassing the normal waiting line to be completed by triage professionals after patient contact and a paper/electronic questionnaire on perceived safety and satisfaction with the emergency access button to be completed by the callers. These questionnaires were developed and validated using external and internal expert feedback, focus group interviews and a two-week field test. The study will be conducted over three months with an estimated user-rate of the emergency access button of 3%. DISCUSSION: We have developed an emergency access button and we now want to investigate whether this new option will influence upon the level of satisfaction and the feeling of safety in the calling patients. Additionally, the study will reveal the assessed relevance of the decision to bypass the line by triage professionals.

trial registrationRegistered as NCT02572115 at Clinicaltrials.gov on October 5

Indexed as

After-Hours CareEmergenciesHealth Services AccessibilityPrimary Health CareDenmarkFemaleHumansMalePatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesTelephoneTriageAccessibilityAfter hoursDenmarkHealth servicesPrimary careTriage

Identifiers

PMID28566087
PMCPMC5452428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.