Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28566019›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2017

Using Evidence To Inform Practice and Policy To Enhance the Quality of Care for Persons with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Michael G Fehlings, Christiana L Cheng, Elaine Chan, Nancy P Thorogood, Vanessa K Noonan, Henry Ahn, Christopher S Bailey, Anoushka Singh, Marcel F Dvorak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael G Fehlings1 Department of Surgery, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .
Christiana L Cheng2 Rick Hansen Institute , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada .
Elaine Chan2 Rick Hansen Institute , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada .
Nancy P Thorogood2 Rick Hansen Institute , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada .
Vanessa K Noonan2 Rick Hansen Institute , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada .
Henry Ahn3 University of Toronto Spine Program , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .
Christopher S Bailey4 Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Western University , London, Ontario, Canada .
Anoushka Singh5 SCI Clinical Research Unit, Toronto Western Hospital , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .
Marcel F Dvorak6 Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada .

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In today's economic climate, there is a need to demonstrate a return on investment for healthcare spending and for clinical practice and policy to be informed by evidence. Navigating this process is difficult for decision-makers, clinicians, and researchers alike. This article will describe how a knowledge translation framework and an evidence-based policy-making process were integrated to clarify the problem, frame options, and plan implementation, to impact clinical practice and policy in the area of traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). The Access to Care and Timing (ACT) project is focused on optimizing the access and timing of specialized healthcare delivery for persons sustaining a tSCI in Canada. A simulation model was developed that uses current patient data to address complex problems faced by the healthcare system. At a workshop, participants stressed the importance of linking interventions to short- and long-term outcomes to drive change. Presently, there are no national, system level indicators to monitor performance after tSCI. Although the ideal system of care after tSCI is unknown, indicator collection will establish a baseline to measure improvement. The workshop participants prioritized two indicators important from the clinician and patient perspective-timely admission to rehabilitation and meaningful community participation. The ACT simulation model for tSCI care will be used to promote the uptake of identified indicators and provide a predictive link between interventions on potential outcomes. The standardized collection of outcome-oriented indicators will help to evaluate the access and timing of care and to define the ideal system of care after SCI.

Indexed as

CanadaEvidence-Based MedicineHumansQuality of Health CareSpinal Cord Injuriesindicatorspolicy makingpractice changespecialized carespinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID28566019
PMCPMC5652974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.