Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28565793›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2017

Involvement of neuronal pathways in the protective effects of hindlimb perconditioning during renal ischemia.

Zahra Sedaghat, Mehri Kadkhodaee, Behjat Seifi, Parisa Ahghari, Khalil Pourkhalili, Zahra Akbari, Mehdi Sadeghi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zahra SedaghatDepartment of Physiology, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Bushehr 7514633341, Iran.
Mehri KadkhodaeeDepartment of Physiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Tehran 1417613151, Iran.
Behjat SeifiDepartment of Physiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Tehran 1417613151, Iran.
Parisa AhghariDepartment of Physiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (International Branch), School of Medicine, Tehran 1417613151, Iran.
Khalil PourkhaliliDepartment of Physiology, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Bushehr 7514633341, Iran.
Zahra AkbariDepartment of Physiology, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Bushehr 7514633341, Iran.
Mehdi SadeghiDepartment of Physiology, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Bushehr 7514633341, Iran.
Bushehr University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remote ischemic perconditioning (RPEC) is a therapeutic intervention that has been demonstrated to reduce renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. However, the underlying renal protective mechanism remains unclear. The present study hypothesized that RPEC may utilize neural pathways to transfer the protective signal from the perconditioned hindlimb to the kidney. Following a right nephrectomy, rats were randomly allocated into five groups (n=6). The sham group underwent the surgical protocol only. In all other groups, the left renal pedicle was clamped for 45 min and reperfused for 24 h. The I/R control group then underwent 45 min ischemia and 24 h reperfusion (I/R) with no more intervention but the I/R-NR control group underwent the ischemia and reperfusion followed by left femoral nerve (FN) and sciatic nerve (SN) resection. The RPEC group underwent ischemia and reperfusion followed by four cycles of 5 min occlusions of the left femoral artery and 5 min reperfusion. Finally, the RPEC-NR group underwent ischemia and reperfusion followed by left FN and SN resection. Following 24 h, renal functional indices, plasma blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (Cr) levels, urinary N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase (NAG) release and histopathological changes were assessed. Compared with the sham group, ischemia and reperfusion in the sham and I/R control groups resulted in renal dysfunction, indicated by significantly increased levels of BUN and Cr. This was accompanied by increased urinary NAG activity and morphological damage observed in control groups. In the RPEC group, renal histology and function were significantly improved compared with the control groups. However, FN and SN resection eliminated the protection of the kidney, which was induced by RPEC. In conclusion, remote hindlimb ischemic perconditioning reduced renal I/R injury in the rat kidney in a manner that potentially involves a neural pathway.

Indexed as

ischemia/reperfusionkidneyneuronal pathwaysperconditioningremote organ

Identifiers

PMID28565793
PMCPMC5443195
OpenAlexW2591920606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.