ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2017
Clinical and genomic responses to ultra-short course chemotherapy in spinal tuberculosis.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification and functional analysis of circular RNAs in intervertebral disc lesion tissues from spinal tuberculosis patients.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Plasma metabolomic analysis reveals the metabolic characteristics and potential diagnostic biomarkers of spinal tuberculosis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Preparation, characterization, and in-vitro cytotoxicity of nanoliposomes loaded with anti-tubercular drugs and TGF-β1 siRNA for improving spinal tuberculosis therapy.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Is 6 Months of Antitubercular Chemotherapy as Effective as More Than 6 Months Regimen in Spinal Tuberculosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Asian spine journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional treatments for spinal tuberculosis (TB) involve chemotherapy and surgery. In the present study, it has been identified that chemotherapy lasting <6 months [ultra-short course chemotherapy (UCCT)], rather than the 6-18 months of the traditional regimen, is effective in sustaining TB clearance following complete surgical debridement. This current study aims to compare the changes in peripheral blood gene expression prior to and following UCCT, subsequent to complete debridement of spinal TB lesions. The study includes 5 patients without TB and 27 patients with spinal, divided into three groups: Group 1 (untreated group, n=8); group 2 (UCCT treatment group, n=9); and group 3 (UCCT treatment 1 year follow-up group, n=10). Gene changes were detected using DNA microarray analysis, confirmed through reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and the results were examined using the DAVID Knowledgebase to identify the pathways and functions of differentially expressed genes. TB lesions were active in group 1, while groups 2 and 3 showed no signs of active TB, as indicated by clinical manifestations and imaging. Comparison of the transcription profiles of the control and study groups showed that treatment of spinal TB resulted in upregulation of genes that are associated with immune response pathways; RT-qPCR produced similar findings. In conclusion, these results indicate that UCCT is an effective treatment against TB following complete surgical debridement. Furthermore, DNA microarray analysis proved a useful tool to evaluate the effects of spinal TB treatment on the expression of genes associated with immune response pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.