Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28564722›Full record

ReviewSeminars in liver disease2017

Update on the Mechanisms of Liver Regeneration.

Morgan E Preziosi, Satdarshan P Monga

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in liver disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Role of TRP Channels in Liver-Related Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. An Eye on Kupffer Cells: Development, Phenotype and the Macrophage Niche.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. MAPK/ERK Pathway as a Central Regulator in Vertebrate Organ Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Critical Role of LSEC in Post-Hepatectomy Liver Regeneration and Failure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Protection of liver sinusoids by intravenous administration of human Muse cells in a rat extra-small partial liver transplantation model.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Morgan E PreziosiDivision of Experimental Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Satdarshan P MongaDivision of Experimental Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

Role of Wnt/Beta-Catenin Signaling in Liver DevelopmentR01DK062277 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Satdarshan Singh Monga · 2004 to 2026
$9.0M
Yap and beta-catenin interactions in liver: Implications in PathophysiologyR01CA204586 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHEN, XIN, MONGA, SATDARSHAN SINGH · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
Role of Platelet derived growth factor receptor-a in Liver Patho-biologyR01DK095498 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MONGA, SATDARSHAN SINGH · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
Targeting beta-catenin in liver pathology: Novel Interactions, Novel ParadigmsR01DK100287 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MONGA, SATDARSHAN SINGH · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204586NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK062277NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK095498NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK100287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver possesses many critical functions such as synthesis, detoxification, and metabolism. It continually receives nutrient-rich blood from gut, which incidentally is also toxin-rich. That may be why liver is uniquely bestowed with a capacity to regenerate. A commonly studied procedure to understand the cellular and molecular basis of liver regeneration is that of surgical resection. Removal of two-thirds of the liver in rodents or patients instigates alterations in hepatic homeostasis, which are sensed by the deficient organ to drive the restoration process. Although the exact mechanisms that initiate regeneration are unknown, alterations in hemodynamics and metabolism have been suspected as important effectors. Key signaling pathways are activated that drive cell proliferation in various hepatic cell types through autocrine and paracrine mechanisms. Once the prehepatectomy mass is regained, the process of regeneration is adequately terminated. This review highlights recent discoveries in the cellular and molecular basis of liver regeneration.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationHepatectomyLiver RegenerationAnimalsEndothelial CellsHepatic Stellate CellsHepatocytesHumansLiverSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID28564722
PMCPMC5700459
OpenAlexW2617569134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.