Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28564537›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2017

Attach-Pull-Release Calculations of Ligand Binding and Conformational Changes on the First BRD4 Bromodomain.

Germano Heinzelmann, Niel M Henriksen, Michael K Gilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. HalogenatedRSC advances · 2025
    Article
  2. Absolute Binding Free Energies with OneOPES.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Catalysis by [GaChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  10. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. On the NS-DSSB unidirectional estimates in the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Best Practices for Alchemical Free Energy Calculations [Article v1.0].Living journal of computational molecular science · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Germano HeinzelmannDepartamento de Fı́sica, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina , Florianópolis, Santa Catarina 88040-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7168-6941
Niel M HenriksenSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego , La Jolla, California 92093, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7916-0757
Michael K GilsonSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego , La Jolla, California 92093, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3375-1738

Funding

THEORY AND MODELING OF NONCOVALENT BINDINGR01GM061300 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MD BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE · PI GILSON, MICHAEL K. · 2000 to 2021
$7.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bromodomains, protein domains involved in epigenetic regulation, are able to bind small molecules with high affinity. In the present study, we report free energy calculations for the binding of seven ligands to the first BRD4 bromodomain, using the attach-pull-release (APR) method to compute the reversible work of removing the ligands from the binding site and then allowing the protein to relax conformationally. We test three different water models, TIP3P, TIP4PEw, and SPC/E, as well as the GAFF and GAFF2 parameter sets for the ligands. Our simulations show that the apo crystal structure of BRD4 is only metastable, with a structural transition happening in the absence of the ligand typically after 20 ns of simulation. We compute the free energy change for this transition with a separate APR calculation on the free protein and include its contribution to the ligand binding free energies, which generally causes an underestimation of the affinities. By testing different water models and ligand parameters, we are also able to assess their influence in our results and determine which one produces the best agreement with the experimental data. Both free energies associated with the conformational change and ligand binding are affected by the choice of water model, with the two sets of ligand parameters affecting their binding free energies to a lesser degree. Across all six combinations of water model and ligand potential function, the Pearson correlation coefficients between calculated and experimental binding free energies range from 0.55 to 0.83, and the root-mean-square errors range from 1.4-3.2 kcal/mol. The current protocol also yields encouraging preliminary results when used to assess the relative stability of ligand poses generated by docking or other methods, as illustrated for two different ligands. Our method takes advantage of the high performance provided by graphics processing units and can readily be applied to other ligands as well as other protein systems.

Indexed as

LigandsBinding SitesBromodomain Containing ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationNuclear ProteinsProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryThermodynamicsTranscription FactorsWaterBRD4 protein, humanBromodomain Containing ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsLigandsNuclear ProteinsTranscription FactorsWater

Identifiers

PMID28564537
PMCPMC5541932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.