Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28562713›Full record

ArticleSalud publica de Mexico

Smokefree implementation in Colombia: Monitoring, outside funding, and business support.

Randy Uang, Eric Crosbie, Stanton A Glantz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Salud publica de Mexico. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Interventions for Tobacco Prevention and Control in Humanitarian Settings: A Scoping Review.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Randy UangCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California. San Francisco.
Eric CrosbieCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California. San Francisco.
Stanton A GlantzCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California. San Francisco.

Funding

ANALYSIS OF TOBACCO INDUSTRY DOCUMENTSR01CA087472 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LING, PAMELA MAY · 2000 to 2018
$12.5M
Postdoctoral training in tobacco controlT32CA113710 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LING, PAMELA MAY · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA087472NCI NIH HHS T32 CA113710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objective: To analyze successful national smokefree policy implementation in Colombia, a middle income country. MATERIALS AND

methods: Key informants at the national and local levels were interviewed and news sources and government ministry resolutions were reviewed.

results: Colombia's Ministry of Health coordinated local implementation practices, which were strongest in larger cities with supportive leadership. Nongovernmental organizations provided technical assistance and highlighted noncompliance. Organizations outside Colombia funded some of these efforts. The bar owners' association provided concerted education campaigns. Tobacco interests did not openly challenge implementation.

conclusions: Health organization monitoring, external funding, and hospitality industry support contributed to effective implementation, and could be cultivated in other low and middle income countries.

Indexed as

Smoke-Free PolicyColombiaFinancing, OrganizedGovernment AgenciesGuideline AdherenceHealth PromotionHumansOrganizationsPublic PolicyRestaurantsTobacco IndustryTobacco Smoke PollutionUniversitiesTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID28562713
PMCPMC5494994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.