ArticlePloS one2017
Design and preliminary analysis of a vaginal inserter for speculum-free cervical cancer screening.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of speculum lubrication on cervical smears for cervical cancer screening: A double blind randomized clinical trial.PloS one · 2024Trial
- Machine Learning Prediction of Vaginal Tissue Tears Using Finite Element Simulations Informed by Planar Biaxial Testing.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- The Callascope: A portable, user-friendly, speculum-free device for diagnostic imaging of cervical cancer precursor lesions.npj women's health · 2026Article
- Development and clinical validation of a clinically translatable non-chip-on-tip transvaginal imaging system (GynoSight v2.0) for early detection of premalignant cervical lesions.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Finite element modeling in obstetrics and gynecology: advances, applications, and challenges.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Patient acceptability of CITOBOT for cervical cancer screening: A mixed-method study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Impact of climate change and environmental adversities on maternal and fetal health: the role of clinical practices and providers in mitigating effects and prioritising women's health in the UK.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Review
- Designing CITOBOT: A portable device for cervical cancer screening using human-centered design, smart prototyping, and artificial intelligence.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Speculum-free portable preterm imaging system.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Optical imaging for early detection of cervical cancer: state of the art and perspectives.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Review
- An Innovative Design for the Vaginal Speculum.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Article
- Cervical Imaging in the Low Resource Setting: A Review.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Using a condom or glove to improve pelvic exam visualization: A guide.SAGE open medicine · 2022Article
- High-resolution disease maps for cancer control in low-resource settings: A spatial analysis of cervical cancer incidence in Kampala, Uganda.Journal of global health · 2022Article
- Feasibility and Acceptability of Tele-Colposcopy on the Caribbean Coast of Nicaragua: A Descriptive Mixed-Methods Study.Telemedicine reports · 2021Article
- Acceptability and Feasibility of Callascope Self-Imaging of the Cervix among Women in Ventanilla, Peru: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study.Journal of womens health and reproductive medicine · 2021Article
- A Framework for Cervical Cancer Elimination in Low-and-Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review and Roadmap for Interventions and Research Priorities.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- A novel speculum-free imaging strategy for visualization of the internal female lower reproductive system.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCervical cancer screening usually requires use of a speculum to provide a clear view of the cervix. The speculum is one potential barrier to screening due to fear of pain, discomfort and embarrassment. The aim of this paper is to present and demonstrate the feasibility of a tampon-sized inserter and the POCkeT Colposcope, a miniature pen sized-colposcope, for comfortable, speculum-free and potentially self-colposcopy. STUDY
designWe explored different designs using 3D computer-aided design (CAD) software and performed mechanical testing simulations on each. Designs were rapid prototyped and tested using a custom vaginal phantom across a range of vaginal pressures and uterine tilts to select an optimal design. Two final designs were tested with fifteen volunteers to assess cervix visualization, comfort and usability compared to the speculum and the optimal design, the curved-tip inserter, was selected for testing in volunteers.
resultsWe present a vaginal inserter as an alternative to the standard speculum for use with the POCkeT Colposcope. The device has a slim tubular body with a funnel-like curved tip measuring approximately 2.5 cm in diameter. The inserter has a channel through which a 2 megapixel (MP) mini camera with LED illumination fits to enable image capture. Mechanical finite element testing simulations with an applied pressure of 15 cm H2O indicated a high factor of safety (90.9) for the inserter. Testing of the device with a custom vaginal phantom, across a range of supine vaginal pressures and uterine tilts (retroverted, anteverted and sideverted), demonstrated image capture with a visual area comparable to the speculum for a normal/axial positioned uteri and significantly better than the speculum for anteverted and sideverted uteri (p<0.00001). Volunteer studies with self-insertion and physician-assisted cervix image capture showed adequate cervix visualization for 83% of patients. In addition, questionnaire responses from volunteers indicated a 92.3% overall preference for the inserter over the speculum and all indicated that the inserter was more comfortable than the speculum. The inserter provides a platform for self-cervical cancer screening and also enables acetic acid/Lugol's iodine application and insertion of swabs for Pap smear sample collection.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of an inserter and miniature-imaging device for comfortable cervical image capture of women with potential for synergistic HPV and Pap smear sample collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.