ArticlePloS one2017
SUV-quantification of physiological lung tissue in an integrated PET/MR-system: Impact of lung density and bone tissue.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET imaging in pulmonary fibrosis: pathophysiology, clinical utility, and emerging theranostic applications.Respiratory research · 2026Review
- 2.5D Multi-View Averaging Diffusion Model for 3D Medical Image Translation: Application to Low-Count PET Reconstruction With CT-Less Attenuation Correction.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2025Article
- Enhanced direct joint attenuation and scatter correction of whole-body PET images via context-aware deep networks.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2025Article
- The impact of MR-based attenuation correction in spinal cord FDG-PET/MR imaging for neurological studies.Medical physics · 2021Article
- Evaluation of a model-based attenuation correction method on whole-bodyRadiological physics and technology · 2021Article
- Standard MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI phantoms: a novel concept using MRI-visible polymer.EJNMMI physics · 2021Article
- Recommendations for Standardizing Thorax PET-CT in Non-Human Primates by Recent Experience from Macaque Studies.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Attenuation correction for human PET/MRI studies.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- PET/MRI attenuation estimation in the lung: A review of past, present, and potential techniques.Medical physics · 2020Review
- Validation of MR-Based Attenuation Correction of a Newly Released Whole-Body Simultaneous PET/MR System.BioMed research international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of the study was to investigate the influence of lung density changes as well as bone proximity on the attenuation correction of lung standardized uptake values (SUVs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: 15 patients with mostly oncologic diseases were examined in 18F-FDG-PET/CT and subsequently in a fully integrated PET/MR scanner. From each PET dataset acquired in PET/MR, four different PET reconstructions were computed using different attenuation maps (μ-maps): i) CT-based μ-map (gold standard); ii) CT-based μ-map in which the linear attenuation coefficients (LAC) of the lung tissue was replaced by the lung LAC from the MR-based segmentation method; iii) based on reconstruction ii), the LAC of bone structures was additionally replaced with the LAC from the MR-based segmentation method; iv) the vendor-provided MR-based μ-map (segmentation-based method). Those steps were performed using MATLAB. CT Hounsfield units (HU) and SUVmean was acquired in different levels and regions of the lung. Relative differences between the differently corrected PETs were computed.
resultsCompared to the gold standard, reconstruction ii), iii) and iv) led to a relative underestimation of SUV in the posterior regions of -9.0%, -13.4% and -14.0%, respectively. Anterior and middle regions were less affected with an overestimation of about 6-8% in reconstructions ii)-iv).
conclusionIt could be shown that both, differences in lung density and the vicinity of bone tissue in the μ-map may have an influence on SUV, mostly affecting the posterior lung regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.