Observational studyMedicine2017
Prevalence trends in the characteristics of patients with allergic asthma in Beijing, 1994 to 2014.
Observational study in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of a home-based exercise program on functional outcomes in women with asthma: A randomized controlled trial.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Trial
- Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Omalizumab in Moderate to Severe Allergic Asthma Patients in China: A Post-Authorization Study.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2023Article
- Just breathe: a review of sex and gender in chronic lung disease.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022Review
- Interferon-Disease markers · 2022Article
- Sex Differences in Paediatric and Adult Asthma.European Medical Journal (Chelmsford, England) · 2019Article
- Integration of Metabolomics and Transcriptomics Reveals the Therapeutic Mechanism Underlying Paeoniflorin for the Treatment of Allergic Asthma.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the clinical profiles and prevalence trends during 1994 to 2014 among patients with allergic asthma (AA), which is a clinical phenotype of asthma.We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics of 319 patients who were diagnosed with AA between March 1, 1994 and February 28, 2014 at 3 Beijing centers.The patients included 155 males and 164 females, and the mean age was 50.86 ± 15.27 years (range 13-86 years). The proportions of asthma attacks in summer and autumn were 60.7% (1994-1999), 61.8% (1999-2004), 56.4% (2004-2009), and 33.1% (2009-2014). The most frequently used medication at home was theophylline (27.9%), which was followed by inhaled corticosteroids (20.38%), inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting beta-2-agonists (10.66%), and leukotriene receptor antagonists (9.4%). The elderly group had the highest rates of summer and autumn attacks, multiple hospitalizations, reduced pulmonary function, smoking history, and positive allergen tests. The middle-aged group had the lowest rates of summer and autumn attacks, and multiple hospitalizations. The youngest group had the lowest rates of reduced pulmonary function, smoking history, and positive allergen tests. The top 5 allergens were dust (9.1%), mites (8.8%), seafood (8.2%), pollen (6.3%), and animal fur (6%). Women were significantly more likely to have a positive allergen test (93 women vs 68 men).The present study revealed the characteristics of Chinese patients with AA, and allergen-specific differences in sex and age during 1994 to 2014. The use of therapeutic drugs at home remains insufficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.