Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28562554›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2017

Effectiveness of entecavir or telbivudine therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection pre-treated with interferon compared with de novo therapy with entecavir and telbivudine.

Shaohang Cai, Jiawei Cao, Tao Yu, Muye Xia, Jie Peng

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Alanine aminotransferase normalization with antiviral therapies in hepatitis B].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shaohang CaiDepartment of Pathology Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Zhejiang State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology Unit, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiawei Cao
Tao Yu
Muye Xia
Jie Peng
Ningbo No.6 Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the optimal treatment following the initial failure of interferon therapy and the potential different efficacy with de novo therapy with entecavir (ETV) or telbivudine (LDT) and following the interferon therapy failure.ETV or LDT therapy following the interferon therapy failure was compared with that of de novo therapy with ETV or LDT in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Treatment parameters included virological response, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization.Of 180 patients studied, 56 received de novo telbivudine monotherapy (LDT group); 45 received entecavir monotherapy (ETV group); 40 received LDT following interferon (interferon-telbivudine [IFN-LDT] group); and 39 received ETV following interferon (interferon-entecavir [IFN-ETV] group). At week 52, virological response occurred in significantly more patients in the IFN-ETV group than the ETV group (87.2% vs 57.8%, P = .003). At week 104, HBeAg seroconversion occurred in significantly more patients in the IFN-ETV group than the ETV group (44.4% vs 22.2%, P = .03). At week 52, virological response was achieved by significantly more patients in the IFN-LDT group than the LDT group (85.0% vs 64.3%, P = .02).This study showed that switch to rescue therapy with ETV or LDT therapy after failure of interferon therapy resulted in more rapid virologic response than with de novo treatment with either ETV or LDT; rescue therapy with ETV resulted in a greater HBeAg seroconversion rate.

Indexed as

AdultAntiviral AgentsDrug Resistance, ViralFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGuanineHepatitis B, ChronicHepatitis B e AntigensHepatitis B virusHumansInterferonsLogistic ModelsMaleMultivariate AnalysisRetreatmentROC CurveAntiviral AgentsentecavirGuanineHepatitis B e AntigensInterferonsTelbivudineThymidine

Identifiers

PMID28562554
PMCPMC5459719
OpenAlexW2620360245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.