Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28562266›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2017

Receptivity to Tobacco Advertising and Susceptibility to Tobacco Products.

John P Pierce, James D Sargent, Martha M White, Nicolette Borek, David B Portnoy, Victoria R Green, Annette R Kaufman, Cassandra A Stanton, Maansi Bansal-Travers, David R Strong and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03786042 (Does Exposure to Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Advertising Affect Positive Smoking Expectancies and Social Normative Beliefs About Smoking?), which is not on this map. Cited by 80 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03786042 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Does Exposure to Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Advertising Affect Positive Smoking Expectancies and Social Normative Beliefs About Smoking?

TypeinterventionalSponsorTrustees of Dartmouth CollegeRan2019 to 2021Enrolled139ConditionsAttentional Bias, Smoking Cues, Positive Perceptions About Cigarette Smoking, Social NormsArmsE-cigarette ad exposure, non e-cigarette TV commercials
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Tobacco Advertising Features That May Contribute to Product Appeal Among US Adolescents and Young Adults.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Trial
  4. Likelihood of Purchasing E-cigarettes Among Adolescents and Young Adults Exposed to E-cigarette Retail Marketing Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Susceptibility to E-Cigarette and Cigarette Use Among U.S. Adolescents.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

John P PierceCancer Prevention Program, Moores Cancer Center, and jppierce@ucsd.edu.
James D SargentC. Everett Koop Institute, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Martha M WhiteCancer Prevention Program, Moores Cancer Center, and.
Nicolette BorekCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
David B PortnoyCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Victoria R GreenNational Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Annette R KaufmanTobacco Control Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Cassandra A StantonWestat, Rockville, Maryland.
Maansi Bansal-TraversDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York.
David R StrongCancer Prevention Program, Moores Cancer Center, and.
Jennifer L PearsonDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
Blair N ColemanCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Eric LeasCancer Prevention Program, Moores Cancer Center, and.
Madison L NobleCancer Prevention Program, Moores Cancer Center, and.
Dennis R TrinidadCancer Prevention Program, Moores Cancer Center, and.
Meghan B MoranDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
Charles CarusiWestat, Rockville, Maryland.
Andrew HylandDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York.
Karen MesserCancer Prevention Program, Moores Cancer Center, and.

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Jesse Nodora · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201100027C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesNon-cigarette tobacco marketing is less regulated and may promote cigarette smoking among adolescents. We quantified receptivity to advertising for multiple tobacco products and hypothesized associations with susceptibility to cigarette smoking.

methodsWave 1 of the nationally representative PATH (Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health) study interviewed 10 751 adolescents who had never used tobacco. A stratified random selection of 5 advertisements for each of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, smokeless products, and cigars were shown from 959 recent tobacco advertisements. Aided recall was classified as low receptivity, and image-liking or favorite ad as higher receptivity. The main dependent variable was susceptibility to cigarette smoking.

resultsAmong US youth, 41% of 12 to 13 year olds and half of older adolescents were receptive to at least 1 tobacco advertisement. Across each age group, receptivity to advertising was highest for e-cigarettes (28%-33%) followed by cigarettes (22%-25%), smokeless tobacco (15%-21%), and cigars (8%-13%). E-cigarette ads shown on television had the highest recall. Among cigarette-susceptible adolescents, receptivity to e-cigarette advertising (39.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 37.9%-41.6%) was higher than for cigarette advertising (31.7%; 95% CI: 29.9%-33.6%). Receptivity to advertising for each tobacco product was associated with increased susceptibility to cigarette smoking, with no significant difference across products (similar odds for both cigarette and e-cigarette advertising; adjusted odds ratio = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.09-1.37).

conclusionsA large proportion of US adolescent never tobacco users are receptive to tobacco advertising, with television advertising for e-cigarettes having the highest recall. Receptivity to advertising for each non-cigarette tobacco product was associated with susceptibility to smoke cigarettes.

Indexed as

AdvertisingAdolescentChildDisease SusceptibilityFemaleHumansMaleNicotianaSmokingUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28562266
PMCPMC5470502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.