Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28561691›Full record

ArticleAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting2017

Improving Quality and Value of Cancer Care for Older Adults.

Erika E Ramsdale, Valerie Csik, Andrew E Chapman, Arash Naeim, Beverly Canin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Models of Care in Geriatric Oncology.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erika E RamsdaleFrom the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Cancer and Aging Research Group, Rhinebeck, NY.
Valerie CsikFrom the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Cancer and Aging Research Group, Rhinebeck, NY.
Andrew E ChapmanFrom the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Cancer and Aging Research Group, Rhinebeck, NY.
Arash NaeimFrom the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Cancer and Aging Research Group, Rhinebeck, NY.
Beverly CaninFrom the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Cancer and Aging Research Group, Rhinebeck, NY.

Funding

X-Ray Crystallography and Macromolecular CharacterizationP30CA056036 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI DANIEL P SILVER · 1995 to 2026
$94.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA056036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concepts of quality and value have become ubiquitous in discussions about health care, including cancer care. Despite their prominence, these concepts remain difficult to encapsulate, with multiple definitions and frameworks emerging over the past few decades. Defining quality and value for the care of older adults with cancer can be particularly challenging. Older adults are heterogeneous and often excluded from clinical trials, severely limiting generalizable data for this population. Moreover, many frameworks for quality and value focus on traditional outcomes of survival and toxicity and neglect goals that may be more meaningful for older adults, such as quality of life and functional independence. A history of quality and value standards and an evaluation of some currently available standards and frameworks elucidate the potential gaps in application to older adults with cancer. However, narrowing the focus to processes of care presents several opportunities for improving the care of older adults with cancer now, even while further work is ongoing to evaluate outcomes and efficiency. New models of care, including the patient-centered medical home, as well as new associated bundled payment models, would be advantageous for older adults with cancer, facilitating collaboration, communication, and patient-centeredness and minimizing the fragmentation that impairs the current provision of cancer care. Advances in information technology support the foundation for these models of care; these technologies facilitate communication, increase available data, support shared decision making, and increase access to multidisciplinary specialty care. Further work will be needed to define and to continue to tailor processes of care to achieve relevant outcomes for older patients with cancer to fulfill the promise of quality and value of care for this vulnerable and growing population.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overHumansNeoplasmsQuality ImprovementQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID28561691
PMCPMC9245494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.