Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28561130›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2017

The effects of natural language processing on cross-institutional portability of influenza case detection for disease surveillance.

Jeffrey P Ferraro, Ye Ye, Per H Gesteland, Peter J Haug, Fuchiang Rich Tsui, Gregory F Cooper, Rudy Van Bree, Thomas Ginter, Andrew J Nowalk, Michael Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Enhancing Cross-Domain Generalizability in Social Determinants of Health Extraction with Prompt-Tuning Large Language Models.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  3. Clinical concept and relation extraction using prompt-based machine reading comprehension.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  4. Transferability of neural network clinical deidentification systems.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jeffrey P FerraroJeffrey P. Ferraro, Homer Warner Center | Intermountain Healthcare, 5171 South Cottonwood St, Suite 220, Murray, Utah 84107, Jeffrey.Ferraro@imail.org, Tel: 801-244-6570.
Ye Ye
Per H Gesteland
Peter J Haug
Fuchiang Rich Tsui
Gregory F Cooper
Rudy Van Bree
Thomas Ginter
Andrew J Nowalk
Michael Wagner

Funding

Probabilistic Disease SurveillanceR01LM011370 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WAGNER, MICHAEL MATTHEW · 2013 to 2015
$1.7M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study evaluates the accuracy and portability of a natural language processing (NLP) tool for extracting clinical findings of influenza from clinical notes across two large healthcare systems. Effectiveness is evaluated on how well NLP supports downstream influenza case-detection for disease surveillance.

methodsWe independently developed two NLP parsers, one at Intermountain Healthcare (IH) in Utah and the other at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) using local clinical notes from emergency department (ED) encounters of influenza. We measured NLP parser performance for the presence and absence of 70 clinical findings indicative of influenza. We then developed Bayesian network models from NLP processed reports and tested their ability to discriminate among cases of (1) influenza, (2) non-influenza influenza-like illness (NI-ILI), and (3) 'other' diagnosis.

resultsOn Intermountain Healthcare reports, recall and precision of the IH NLP parser were 0.71 and 0.75, respectively, and UPMC NLP parser, 0.67 and 0.79. On University of Pittsburgh Medical Center reports, recall and precision of the UPMC NLP parser were 0.73 and 0.80, respectively, and IH NLP parser, 0.53 and 0.80. Bayesian case-detection performance measured by AUROC for influenza versus non-influenza on Intermountain Healthcare cases was 0.93 (using IH NLP parser) and 0.93 (using UPMC NLP parser). Case-detection on University of Pittsburgh Medical Center cases was 0.95 (using UPMC NLP parser) and 0.83 (using IH NLP parser). For influenza versus NI-ILI on Intermountain Healthcare cases performance was 0.70 (using IH NLP parser) and 0.76 (using UPMC NLP parser). On University of Pisstburgh Medical Center cases, 0.76 (using UPMC NLP parser) and 0.65 (using IH NLP parser).

conclusionIn all but one instance (influenza versus NI-ILI using IH cases), local parsers were more effective at supporting case-detection although performances of non-local parsers were reasonable.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringNatural Language ProcessingAcademic Medical CentersElectronic Health RecordsHumansInfluenza, HumanMedical InformaticsPublic Healthcase detectiondisease surveillancegeneralizabilityNatural language processingportability

Identifiers

PMID28561130
PMCPMC6241736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.