Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28561042›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Systematic discovery of mutation-specific synthetic lethals by mining pan-cancer human primary tumor data.

Subarna Sinha, Daniel Thomas, Steven Chan, Yang Gao, Diede Brunen, Damoun Torabi, Andreas Reinisch, David Hernandez, Andy Chan, Erinn B Rankin and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Subarna SinhaDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Daniel ThomasDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Cancer Institute, and Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Steven ChanPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9.
Yang GaoDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Diede BrunenDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
Damoun TorabiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Cancer Institute, and Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Andreas ReinischDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Cancer Institute, and Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
David HernandezDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Cancer Institute, and Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Andy ChanDivision of Radiation and Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Erinn B RankinDivision of Radiation and Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Rene BernardsDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066 CX, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8677-3423
Ravindra MajetiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Cancer Institute, and Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
David L DillDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USStanford University · USThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLStanford Medicine · USUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

MODELING THE ROLE OF PROGRESSION IN FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMAU54CA149145 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FELSHER, DEAN W · 2010 to 2014
$12.1M
Preclinical Testing of a Novel Therapy Targeting AXL in Advanced Kidney CancerR01CA198291 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RANKIN, ERINN B · 2016 to 2020
$2.4M
Pre-Leukemic Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Clonal Evolution in Human AMLR01CA188055 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MAJETI, RAVINDRA · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
Discovery of Synthetic Lethals in Pan-Cancer Genomic Data Using Boolean MethodsR21CA195127 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DILL, DAVID L., MAJETI, RAVINDRA · 2015 to 2016
$385k
Discovery of Synthetic Lethal Targets for Recurrent Epigenetic Mutations in Acute Myeloid LeukemiaK99CA207731 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI THOMAS, DANIEL · 2017 to 2018
$347k
Austrian Science Fund FWF J 3358NCI NIH HHS K99 CA207731NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188055NCI NIH HHS R01 CA198291NCI NIH HHS R21 CA195127NCI NIH HHS U54 CA149145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two genes are synthetically lethal (SL) when defects in both are lethal to a cell but a single defect is non-lethal. SL partners of cancer mutations are of great interest as pharmacological targets; however, identifying them by cell line-based methods is challenging. Here we develop MiSL (Mining Synthetic Lethals), an algorithm that mines pan-cancer human primary tumour data to identify mutation-specific SL partners for specific cancers. We apply MiSL to 12 different cancers and predict 145,891 SL partners for 3,120 mutations, including known mutation-specific SL partners. Comparisons with functional screens show that MiSL predictions are enriched for SLs in multiple cancers. We extensively validate a SL interaction identified by MiSL between the IDH1 mutation and ACACA in leukaemia using gene targeting and patient-derived xenografts. Furthermore, we apply MiSL to pinpoint genetic biomarkers for drug sensitivity. These results demonstrate that MiSL can accelerate precision oncology by identifying mutation-specific targets and biomarkers.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMCF-7 CellsMiceNeoplasm TransplantationPrecision MedicineRNA InterferenceRNA, Small InterferingSynthetic Lethal MutationsTransplantation, HeterologousRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID28561042
PMCPMC5460027
OpenAlexW2618439945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.