Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28561035›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Inner centromere localization of the CPC maintains centromere cohesion and allows mitotic checkpoint silencing.

Rutger C C Hengeveld, Martijn J M Vromans, Mathijs Vleugel, Michael A Hadders, Susanne M A Lens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Structure and function of the outer kinetochore.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Principles and dynamics of spindle assembly checkpoint signalling.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rutger C C HengeveldDepartment of Molecular Cancer Research, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, Utrecht 3584 CG, The Netherlands.
Martijn J M VromansDepartment of Molecular Cancer Research, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, Utrecht 3584 CG, The Netherlands.
Mathijs VleugelDepartment of Molecular Cancer Research, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, Utrecht 3584 CG, The Netherlands.
Michael A HaddersDepartment of Molecular Cancer Research, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, Utrecht 3584 CG, The Netherlands.
Susanne M A LensDepartment of Molecular Cancer Research, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, Utrecht 3584 CG, The Netherlands.
Cancer Genomics Centre · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faithful chromosome segregation during mitosis requires that the kinetochores of all sister chromatids become stably connected to microtubules derived from opposite spindle poles. How stable chromosome bi-orientation is accomplished and coordinated with anaphase onset remains incompletely understood. Here we show that stable chromosome bi-orientation requires inner centromere localization of the non-enzymatic subunits of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) to maintain centromeric cohesion. Precise inner centromere localization of the CPC appears less relevant for Aurora B-dependent resolution of erroneous kinetochore-microtubule (KT-MT) attachments and for the stabilization of bi-oriented KT-MT attachments once sister chromatid cohesion is preserved via knock-down of WAPL. However, Aurora B inner centromere localization is essential for mitotic checkpoint silencing to allow spatial separation from its kinetochore substrate KNL1. Our data infer that the CPC is localized at the inner centromere to sustain centromere cohesion on bi-oriented chromosomes and to coordinate mitotic checkpoint silencing with chromosome bi-orientation.

Indexed as

MitosisAnaphaseAurora Kinase BCell Cycle ProteinsCentromereChromatidsChromosomesChromosome SegregationGene SilencingHeLa CellsHumansKinetochoresMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesM Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsPhosphorylationAURKB protein, humanAurora Kinase BCell Cycle ProteinsKnl1 protein, humanMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID28561035
PMCPMC5460030
OpenAlexW2617988882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.