Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28560947›Full record

Trial reportPublic health nutrition2017

Food security among individuals experiencing homelessness and mental illness in the At Home/Chez Soi Trial.

Patricia O'Campo, Stephen W Hwang, Agnes Gozdzik, Andrée Schuler, Vered Kaufman-Shriqui, Daniel Poremski, Luis Ivan Palma Lazgare, Jino Distasio, Slimane Belbraouet, Sindi Addorisio

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Public health nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Study Protocol: Homelessness and Health: Integrating Structural, Social, and Behavioral Pathways.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Food Insecurity in Homeless Families in the Paris Region (France): Results from the ENFAMS Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Patricia O'Campo1Centre for Research on Inner City Health,St. Michael's Hospital,30 Bond Street,Toronto,Ontario,Canada,M5B 1W8.
Stephen W Hwang1Centre for Research on Inner City Health,St. Michael's Hospital,30 Bond Street,Toronto,Ontario,Canada,M5B 1W8.
Agnes Gozdzik1Centre for Research on Inner City Health,St. Michael's Hospital,30 Bond Street,Toronto,Ontario,Canada,M5B 1W8.
Andrée Schuler1Centre for Research on Inner City Health,St. Michael's Hospital,30 Bond Street,Toronto,Ontario,Canada,M5B 1W8.
Vered Kaufman-Shriqui1Centre for Research on Inner City Health,St. Michael's Hospital,30 Bond Street,Toronto,Ontario,Canada,M5B 1W8.
Daniel Poremski1Centre for Research on Inner City Health,St. Michael's Hospital,30 Bond Street,Toronto,Ontario,Canada,M5B 1W8.
Luis Ivan Palma Lazgare1Centre for Research on Inner City Health,St. Michael's Hospital,30 Bond Street,Toronto,Ontario,Canada,M5B 1W8.
Jino Distasio5Department of Geography & Institute of Urban Studies,University of Winnipeg,Winnipeg,Manitoba,Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2630-4865
Slimane Belbraouet6School of Food Science,Nutrition and Family Studies,University of Moncton,Moncton,New Brunswick,Canada.
Sindi Addorisio7Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences (CHEOS),Vancouver,British Columbia,Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIndividuals experiencing homelessness are particularly vulnerable to food insecurity. The At Home/Chez Soi study provides a unique opportunity to first examine baseline levels of food security among homeless individuals with mental illness and second to evaluate the effect of a Housing First (HF) intervention on food security in this population.

designAt Home/Chez Soi was a 2-year randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of HF compared with usual care among homeless adults with mental illness, stratified by level of need for mental health services (high or moderate). Logistic regressions tested baseline associations between food security (US Food Security Survey Module), study site, sociodemographic variables, duration of homelessness, alcohol/substance use, physical health and service utilization. Negative binomial regression determined the impact of the HF intervention on achieving levels of high or marginal food security over an 18-month follow-up period (6 to 24 months).

settingCommunity settings at five Canadian sites (Moncton, Montreal, Toronto, Winnipeg and Vancouver). SUBJECTS: Homeless adults with mental illness (n 2148).

resultsApproximately 41 % of our sample reported high or marginal food security at baseline, but this figure varied with gender, age, mental health issues and substance use problems. High need participants who received HF were more likely to achieve marginal or high food security than those receiving usual care, but only at the Toronto and Moncton sites.

conclusionsOur large multi-site study demonstrated low levels of food security among homeless experiencing mental illness. HF showed promise for improving food security among participants with high levels of need for mental health services, with notable site differences.

Indexed as

Food SupplyIll-Housed PersonsMental DisordersAdolescentAdultCanadaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHousingHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultFood securityHomelessnessMental healthRandomized trial

Identifiers

PMID28560947
PMCPMC10261387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.