Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28560858›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2017

Basal subtype is predictive for response to cetuximab treatment in patient-derived xenografts of squamous cell head and neck cancer.

Konrad Klinghammer, Raik Otto, Jan-Dirk Raguse, Andreas E Albers, Ingeborg Tinhofer, Iduna Fichtner, Ulf Leser, Ulrich Keilholz, Jens Hoffmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Towards precision oncology with patient-derived xenografts.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genomics Reloaded: Rise of the Expression Profiles.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Konrad KlinghammerDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Charité, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6425-4833
Raik OttoWBI, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jan-Dirk RaguseDepartment of Maxillio-Facial Surgery, Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas E AlbersDepartment of ENT, Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Ingeborg TinhoferDepartment of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Iduna FichtnerExperimental Pharmacology & Oncology GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Ulf LeserWBI, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ulrich KeilholzComprehensive Cancer Center, Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Jens HoffmannExperimental Pharmacology & Oncology GmbH, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cetuximab is the single targeted therapy approved for the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNSCC). Predictive biomarkers have not been established and patient stratification based on molecular tumor profiles has not been possible. Since EGFR pathway activation is pronounced in basal subtype, we hypothesized this activation could be a predictive signature for an EGFR directed treatment. From our patient-derived xenograft platform of HNSCC, 28 models were subjected to Affymetrix gene expression studies on HG U133+ 2.0. Based on the expression of 821 genes, the subtype of each of the 28 models was determined by integrating gene expression profiles through centroid-clustering with previously published gene expression data by Keck et al. The models were treated in groups of 5-6 animals with docetaxel, cetuximab, everolimus, cis- or carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Response was evaluated by comparing tumor volume at treatment initiation and after 3 weeks of treatment (RTV). Tumors distributed over the 3 signature-defined subtypes: 5 mesenchymal/inflamed phenotype (MS), 15 basal type (BA), 8 classical type (CL). Cluster analysis revealed a strong correlation between response to cetuximab and the basal subtype. RTV MS 3.32 vs. BA 0.78 (MS vs. BA, unpaired t-test, p 0.0002). Cetuximab responders were distributed as following: 1/5 in MS, 5/8 in CL and 13/15 in the BA group. Activity of classical chemotherapies did not differ between the subtypes. In conclusion basal subtype was associated with response to EGFR directed therapy in head and neck squamous cell cancer patient-derived xenografts.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBasal Cell CarcinomaCarboplatinCarcinoma, Squamous CellCetuximabDNA Mutational AnalysisDocetaxelErbB ReceptorsEverolimusFluorouracilGene ExpressionHead and Neck NeoplasmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiceAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinCetuximabDocetaxelEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsEverolimusFluorouracilTaxoidscetuximabEGFRhead and neck cancermolecular subtypepatient-derived xenograft

Identifiers

PMID28560858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.