Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28560732›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2018

Log Odds and the Interpretation of Logit Models.

Edward C Norton, Bryan E Dowd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Shift work and the risk for metabolic syndrome among healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Financial Burdens of Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors and Outcomes.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Distribution and Occurrence of Cercospora Leaf Spot of Mungbean (Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Edward C NortonDepartment of Health Management and Policy, Department of Economics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0003-4555-0631
Bryan E DowdDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-3384-5144

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe discuss how to interpret coefficients from logit models, focusing on the importance of the standard deviation (σ) of the error term to that interpretation. STUDY

designWe show how odds ratios are computed, how they depend on the standard deviation (σ) of the error term, and their sensitivity to different model specifications. We also discuss alternatives to odds ratios. PRINCIPAL

findingsThere is no single odds ratio; instead, any estimated odds ratio is conditional on the data and the model specification. Odds ratios should not be compared across different studies using different samples from different populations. Nor should they be compared across models with different sets of explanatory variables.

conclusionsTo communicate information regarding the effect of explanatory variables on binary {0,1} dependent variables, average marginal effects are generally preferable to odds ratios, unless the data are from a case-control study.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalLogistic ModelsHumansOdds RatioLogitmarginal effectsodds ratioprobitrisk ratio

Identifiers

PMID28560732
PMCPMC5867187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.