Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28560664›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2017

External validation of the diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma survival prediction model: a collaborative report from the International DIPG Registry and the SIOPE DIPG Registry.

Sophie E M Veldhuijzen van Zanten, Adam Lane, Martijn W Heymans, Joshua Baugh, Brooklyn Chaney, Lindsey M Hoffman, Renee Doughman, Marc H A Jansen, Esther Sanchez, William P Vandertop and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sophie E M Veldhuijzen van ZantenDepartment of Paediatrics, Division of Oncology/Haematology, VU University Medical Center (VUmc), De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.veldhuijzen@vumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3888-0977
Adam LaneDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Martijn W HeymansDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center (VUmc), De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joshua BaughDepartment of Pediatrics, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Brooklyn ChaneyDepartment of Pediatrics, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Lindsey M HoffmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Renee DoughmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Marc H A JansenDepartment of Paediatrics, Division of Oncology/Haematology, VU University Medical Center (VUmc), De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Esther SanchezDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center (VUmc), De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
William P VandertopDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, Room 2F 020, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gertjan J L KaspersDepartment of Paediatrics, Division of Oncology/Haematology, VU University Medical Center (VUmc), De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dannis G van VuurdenDepartment of Paediatrics, Division of Oncology/Haematology, VU University Medical Center (VUmc), De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maryam FouladiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center (VUmc), De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Blaise V JonesDepartment of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
James LeachDepartment of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to perform external validation of the recently developed survival prediction model for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), and discuss its utility. The DIPG survival prediction model was developed in a cohort of patients from the Netherlands, United Kingdom and Germany, registered in the SIOPE DIPG Registry, and includes age <3 years, longer symptom duration and receipt of chemotherapy as favorable predictors, and presence of ring-enhancement on MRI as unfavorable predictor. Model performance was evaluated by analyzing the discrimination and calibration abilities. External validation was performed using an unselected cohort from the International DIPG Registry, including patients from United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Basic comparison with the results of the original study was performed using descriptive statistics, and univariate- and multivariable regression analyses in the validation cohort. External validation was assessed following a variety of analyses described previously. Baseline patient characteristics and results from the regression analyses were largely comparable. Kaplan-Meier curves of the validation cohort reproduced separated groups of standard (n = 39), intermediate (n = 125), and high-risk (n = 78) patients. This discriminative ability was confirmed by similar values for the hazard ratios across these risk groups. The calibration curve in the validation cohort showed a symmetric underestimation of the predicted survival probabilities. In this external validation study, we demonstrate that the DIPG survival prediction model has acceptable cross-cohort calibration and is able to discriminate patients with short, average, and increased survival. We discuss how this clinico-radiological model may serve a useful role in current clinical practice.

Indexed as

RegistriesAdolescentBrain Stem NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleGliomaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInfantInfant, NewbornKaplan-Meier EstimateMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrognosisCalibrationCox proportional hazards modelingDiscriminationExternal validationPrognostic modeling

Identifiers

PMID28560664
PMCPMC5543206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.