Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28560597›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2017

Increased Grade in Neuroendocrine Tumor Metastases Negatively Impacts Survival.

Kendall J Keck, Allen Choi, Jessica E Maxwell, Guiying Li, Thomas M O'Dorisio, Patrick Breheny, Andrew M Bellizzi, James R Howe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The University of Iowa Neuroendocrine Tumor Clinic.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kendall J KeckDepartment of Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Allen ChoiDepartment of Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Jessica E MaxwellDepartment of Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Guiying LiDepartment of Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Thomas M O'DorisioDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Patrick BrehenyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Andrew M BellizziDepartment of Pathology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
James R HoweDepartment of Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA. james-howe@uiowa.edu.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Project 4: New Approaches to Improving the Effectiveness of Radionuclide Targeted Treatments in Neuroendocrine TumorsP50CA174521 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ODORISIO, THOMAS · 2015 to 2021
$13.2M
SHORT-TERM TRAINING: STUDENTS IN HEALTH PROF. SCHOOLST35HL007485 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ROGHAIR, ROBERT D · 1985 to 2019
$4.3M
University of Iowa Surgical Oncology Training GrantT32CA148062 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WEIGEL, RONALD J · 2010 to 2020
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA174521NCI NIH HHS T32 CA148062NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumor grade is an important predictor of survival in gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), as determined by Ki-67 expression and mitotic rate. NETs generally grow indolently, but some cells may acquire traits facilitating metastasis. It is unclear how frequently metastases differ in grade from their primary tumors, and whether increasing grade in metastases affects prognosis.

methodsKi-67 immunohistochemistry was performed on resected GEPNET specimens and cases with results for both primary tumors and concurrent metastases were identified. Grade was determined using a modified World Health Organization classification (Ki-67: G1 = 0-2%; G2 > 2-20%; G3 > 20%).

resultsKi-67 was performed on both the primary tumor and metastases in 103 patients. Tumor grade was higher in metastases from 25 (24%) patients, 24 increased from G1 to G2, and 1 increased from G2 to G3; 68 (66%) patients had no change in grade (42 G1 and 26 G2), and 10 (10%) decreased from G2 to G1. No clinicopathologic factors were predictive of higher grade in metastases. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 55% for patients with stable grade versus 8% of patients with increased grade, while 5-year overall survival (OS) was 92 and 54%, respectively. The 5-year OS of patients who had stable grade with G1 and G2 primaries was 92 and 64%, respectively.

conclusionsNearly one-third of patients had metastases with a different grade than their primary, and, when grade increased, both PFS and OS significantly decreased. Determining the grade in both the primary tumor and a metastasis is important for estimating prognosis and to help inform decisions regarding additional therapies.

Indexed as

FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsProspective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID28560597
PMCPMC5772651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.