ArticleEJNMMI physics2017
EORTC PET response criteria are more influenced by reconstruction inconsistencies than PERCIST but both benefit from the EARL harmonization program.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Twenty Years On: RECIST as a Biomarker of Response in Solid Tumours an EORTC Imaging Group - ESOI Joint Paper.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- New FDG-PET/CT interpretation criteria (Huaxi criteria) for response assessment in patients with nasal-type extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: development and validation.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- High concordance of PET-CT treatment response evaluation according to PERCIST 1.0 when comparing images reconstructed with OSEM vs. BSREM.Clinical physiology and functional imaging · 2025Article
- Metabolic Imaging of Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Sonidegib: A Retrospective Case Series Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The impact of introducing deep learning based [EJNMMI research · 2024Article
- Harmonization of standard uptake values across different positron emission tomography/computed tomography systems and different reconstruction algorithms: validation in oncology patients.EJNMMI physics · 2023Article
- A review of harmonization strategies for quantitative PET.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2023Review
- Joint EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM practice guidelines/procedure standards on recommended use of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the Accuracy of Standardized Uptake Values ofSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2021Article
- How Often Do We Fail to Classify the Treatment Response with [Molecular imaging and biology · 2019Article
- Why harmonization is needed when using FDG PET/CT as a prognosticator: demonstration with EARL-compliant SUV as an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Article
- EORTC PET response criteria are more influenced by reconstruction inconsistencies than PERCIST but both benefit from the EARL harmonization program.EJNMMI physics · 2017Article
- EANM/EARL harmonization strategies in PET quantification: from daily practice to multicentre oncological studies.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017Review
- Optimization of Reconstruction Parameters for Discovery 710 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluates the consistency of PET evaluation response criteria in solid tumours (PERCIST) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) classification across different reconstruction algorithms and whether aligning standardized uptake values (SUVs) to the European Association of Nuclear Medicine acquisition (EANM)/EARL standards provides more consistent response classification. MATERIALS AND
methodsBaseline (
resultsUsing OSEM
conclusionPERCIST classification is less sensitive to reconstruction algorithm-dependent variability than EORTC classification but harmonizing SULs within the EARL program is equally effective with either.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.