Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28560557›Full record

ReviewArchivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis2018

Heterogeneity Among Neutrophils.

Marzena Garley, Ewa Jabłońska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Deregulation of cytokine affecting oral neutrophil subsets in oral cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Tumor-Mediated Neutrophil Polarization and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marzena GarleyDepartment of Immunology, Medical University of Bialystok, J. Waszyngtona 15A, 15-269, Białystok, Poland. marzena.garley@umb.edu.pl.
Ewa JabłońskaDepartment of Immunology, Medical University of Bialystok, J. Waszyngtona 15A, 15-269, Białystok, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutrophils (PMNs) play a key role in innate defence mechanisms. Generally, PMNs were considered to have a homogeneous population of mature and diversified cells. It seems, however, that their pleiotropic action results from the existence of different subpopulations in this group of cells. There are data that confirm the involvement of PMNs in the direct activation of other cells in non-specific response, as well as specialised cells in specific response. For example, there have been observations of PMNs with different levels of activity in relation to lymphocytes, and a population was identified which had characteristics similar to those of cells which are capable of presenting antigens. There are also reports of PMNs which demonstrate different survival time or capacity for chemotaxis. Other studies suggest that the neutrophil response to Staphylococcus aureus is diverse (not identical among all neutrophil). There are also reports of PMNs with varying activity during inflammation, which might explain many as yet unknown pathophysiological aspects of their hyperreactivity. The functional dualism of PMNs in the course of neoplastic disorders raises a lot of controversy. This paper presents the current state of knowledge of the heterogeneity of PMNs and their potential roles in different stages of disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiodiversityChemotaxisHumansInflammationNeoplasmsNeutrophilsStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusHeterogeneityNeutrophilsPMNsPopulationsSubpopulations

Identifiers

PMID28560557
PMCPMC5767199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.