Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28560502›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2018

Proximal carious lesions infiltration-a 3-year follow-up study of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Rodrigo Alex Arthur, Julio Eduardo Zenkner, Jose Carlos d'Ornellas Pereira Júnior, Rafaela Trevisan Correia, Luana Severo Alves, Marisa Maltz

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rodrigo Alex ArthurFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2492, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-003, Brazil.
Julio Eduardo ZenknerFederal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Rua Marechal Floriano Peixoto, 1184, Santa Maria, 97015-372, Brazil.
Jose Carlos d'Ornellas Pereira JúniorFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2492, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-003, Brazil.
Rafaela Trevisan CorreiaFederal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Rua Marechal Floriano Peixoto, 1184, Santa Maria, 97015-372, Brazil.
Luana Severo AlvesFederal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Rua Marechal Floriano Peixoto, 1184, Santa Maria, 97015-372, Brazil.
Marisa MaltzFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2492, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-003, Brazil. marisa.maltz@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInfiltration of carious lesion has been claimed as a promising approach for the management of non-cavitated proximal lesions (NCPL). Clinical studies have suggested that this approach may reduce NCPL progression in individuals whose caries risk was not change over the studied period.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the additional benefit of infiltration of NCPL over a 3-year period in a group of individuals who received treatment and control of carious activity. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty-two caries-active subjects that possessed at least a pair of NCPL in posterior teeth were selected for this study totalizing 36 pairs of lesion. In a split-mouth design, lesions were randomly allocated to test (infiltration) or placebo treatments. At follow-up, lesions were radiographically analyzed, progression was determined by radiographic pair-wise comparison and differences in number of progressing lesions between test, and placebo-treated surfaces were compared.

resultsSeventeen subjects (27 pairs of lesions) were followed up. Only four subjects were caries-active at the follow-up. In the test group, 2/27 (7.4%) lesions and in the placebo group 5/27 (18.5%) lesions had progressed. No statistical difference was observed between the studied groups (p = 0.453).

conclusionSubjects under treatment focusing on controlling caries activity presented low progression rates in both infiltrated and non-infiltrated NCPL. As only very few lesions progressed in both groups, no significant additional effect could be found. Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Infiltration of NCPL may have limited additional effect if other treatments focused on controlling caries activity are successful.

Indexed as

Acid Etching, DentalAdolescentAdultDental CariesDental Restoration, PermanentDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePeriodontal IndexResins, SyntheticTooth DemineralizationTreatment Outcomeicon infiltrantResins, SyntheticCaries infiltrantClinical trialLesion progressionNon-cavitated caries lesions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.