Trial reportClinical oral investigations2018
Proximal carious lesions infiltration-a 3-year follow-up study of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Microinvasive interventions in the management of proximal caries lesions in primary and permanent teeth- systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Nonrestorative Caries Treatment: A Systematic Review Update.International dental journal · 2022Pooled it
- Infiltration and sealing for managing non-cavitated proximal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2021Pooled it
- How to intervene in the caries process: proximal caries in adolescents and adults-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2020Pooled it
- Resin Infiltration in the Conservative Management of Incipient Dental Caries: An Evidence-Based Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- One- and Two-Year Efficacy of Resin Infiltration and Remineralization for the Treatment of Initial Proximal Caries.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Clinical and Radiographic Progression of Proximal Enamel Caries of Primary Molars Following the Application of Resin Infiltrant vs Tooth Mousse.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2024Article
- Resin Infiltration of Non-Cavitated Proximal Caries Lesions in Primary and Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review and Scenario Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Randomized in situ evaluation of surface polishing protocols on the caries-protective effect of resin Infiltrant.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Efficacy of Resin Infiltrate in Noncavitated Proximal Carious Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInfiltration of carious lesion has been claimed as a promising approach for the management of non-cavitated proximal lesions (NCPL). Clinical studies have suggested that this approach may reduce NCPL progression in individuals whose caries risk was not change over the studied period.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the additional benefit of infiltration of NCPL over a 3-year period in a group of individuals who received treatment and control of carious activity. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-two caries-active subjects that possessed at least a pair of NCPL in posterior teeth were selected for this study totalizing 36 pairs of lesion. In a split-mouth design, lesions were randomly allocated to test (infiltration) or placebo treatments. At follow-up, lesions were radiographically analyzed, progression was determined by radiographic pair-wise comparison and differences in number of progressing lesions between test, and placebo-treated surfaces were compared.
resultsSeventeen subjects (27 pairs of lesions) were followed up. Only four subjects were caries-active at the follow-up. In the test group, 2/27 (7.4%) lesions and in the placebo group 5/27 (18.5%) lesions had progressed. No statistical difference was observed between the studied groups (p = 0.453).
conclusionSubjects under treatment focusing on controlling caries activity presented low progression rates in both infiltrated and non-infiltrated NCPL. As only very few lesions progressed in both groups, no significant additional effect could be found. Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Infiltration of NCPL may have limited additional effect if other treatments focused on controlling caries activity are successful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28560502What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.