Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28560473›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2017

Low-intensity laser therapy efficacy evaluation in FVB mice subjected to acute and chronic arthritis.

João Paulo Mardegan Issa, Bianca Ferreira Trawitzki, Edilson Ervolino, Ana Paula Macedo, Lothar Lilge

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Low-power infrared laser on telomere maintenance in an experimental model of arthritis.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

João Paulo Mardegan IssaSchool of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bianca Ferreira TrawitzkiSchool of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Edilson ErvolinoPaulista State University, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Paula MacedoSchool of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lothar LilgePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 101 College Street, Toronto, M5G1L7, Ontario, Canada. llilge@uhnres.utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5533-0005
University Health Network · CAUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis, an autoimmune inflammation, has a high prevalence in the population, and while therapy is available, it required often injection of drugs causing discomfort to patients. This study evaluates the clinical and histological effect of low-intensity laser therapy (LILT) as an alternative treatment, in a murine model of acute and chronic inflammation. FVB mice received either a Zymosan A injection into one knee joint inducing acute inflammation, followed after 15 min or 24 h by LILT or a collagen bovine type II injection emulsified in "Freund's Complete Adjuvant" to induce chronic arthritis, followed at 4 weeks with multiple LILT sessions. LILT mediated by either 660, 808, or 905 nm and tissue response was evaluated based on clinical symptoms and histological analysis of inflammatory infiltrate and damage to the articular surfaces. LILT can be effective in elevating clinical symptoms, so Kruskal-Wallis testing indicated no significant differences between knees affected by acute arthritis and treated once with LILT and an injured knee without treatment (p > 0.05) for 660 and 808 nm with some improvements for the 905-nm LILT. Mice receiving two treatments for acute arthritis showed exacerbation of inflammation and articular resorption following therapy with a 660-nm continuous laser (p < 0.05). For chronic inflammation, differences were not noted between LILT treated and untreated injured knee joints (p > 0.05). Among the lasers, the 905 nm tends to show better results for anti-inflammatory effect in acute arthritis, and the 660 nm showed better results in chronic arthritis. In conclusion, LILT wavelength selection depends on the arthritis condition and can demonstrate anti-inflammatory effects for chronic arthritis and reduced resorption area in this murine model.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAnimalsArthritis, ExperimentalCartilage, ArticularCattleChronic DiseaseCollagen Type IIDisease Models, AnimalFreund's AdjuvantImmunohistochemistryKnee JointLow-Level Light TherapyMaleMiceZymosanCollagen Type IIFreund's AdjuvantZymosanHistologyImmunohistochemistryInflammationLiltRepair

Identifiers

PMID28560473
OpenAlexW2618831771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.