Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28560331›Full record

ArticleScience advances2017

Repeated divergent selection on pigmentation genes in a rapid finch radiation.

Leonardo Campagna, Márcio Repenning, Luís Fábio Silveira, Carla Suertegaray Fontana, Pablo L Tubaro, Irby J Lovette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Widespread variation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A genomic basis of vocal rhythm in birds.Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  17. How Important Is Sexual Isolation to Speciation?Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. PeerJ · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leonardo CampagnaFuller Evolutionary Biology Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 159 Sapsucker Woods Road, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.
Márcio RepenningPUCRS- Curso de Pós-graduação em Zoologia, Laboratório de Ornitologia, Museu de Ciências e Tecnologia, Avenida Ipiranga 6681, 90619-900 Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Luís Fábio SilveiraSeção de Aves, Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 42.494, CEP 04218-970 São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-2576-7657
Carla Suertegaray FontanaPUCRS- Curso de Pós-graduação em Zoologia, Laboratório de Ornitologia, Museu de Ciências e Tecnologia, Avenida Ipiranga 6681, 90619-900 Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Pablo L TubaroDivisión de Ornitología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia" (MACN - CONICET), Avenida Ángel Gallardo 470, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, C1405DJR Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Irby J LovetteFuller Evolutionary Biology Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 159 Sapsucker Woods Road, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Instances of recent and rapid speciation are suitable for associating phenotypes with their causal genotypes, especially if gene flow homogenizes areas of the genome that are not under divergent selection. We study a rapid radiation of nine sympatric bird species known as capuchino seedeaters, which are differentiated in sexually selected characters of male plumage and song. We sequenced the genomes of a phenotypically diverse set of species to search for differentiated genomic regions. Capuchinos show differences in a small proportion of their genomes, yet selection has acted independently on the same targets in different members of this radiation. Many divergent regions contain genes involved in the melanogenesis pathway, with the strongest signal originating from putative regulatory regions. Selection has acted on these same genomic regions in different lineages, likely shaping the evolution of cis-regulatory elements, which control how more conserved genes are expressed and thereby generate diversity in classically sexually selected traits.

Indexed as

GenomeQuantitative Trait, HeritableSelection, GeneticAnimalsFemaleFinchesMalePigmentationCapuchino SeedeatersGenomic ScanMelanogenesisNeotropicssexual selection

Identifiers

PMID28560331
PMCPMC5443641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.