Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28560151›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2017

Auditory prediction errors as individual biomarkers of schizophrenia.

J A Taylor, N Matthews, P T Michie, M J Rosa, M I Garrido

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Schizophrenia: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence Techniques Applied to Detection and Classification.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  9. Effects of age and sex on eye movement characteristics.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

J A TaylorQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Australia; School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Australia.
N MatthewsSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Australia.
P T MichieSchool of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia; Priority Centre for Brain and Mental Health Research, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
M J RosaMax-Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, UK; Department of Computer Science, University College London, UK.
M I GarridoQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Australia; School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, Australia; Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, Australia; ARC Centre for Integrative Brain Function, Australia. Electronic address: m.garrido@uq.edu.au.
The University of Queensland · AUProstate Cancer Research · GBQueensland University of Technology · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a complex psychiatric disorder, typically diagnosed through symptomatic evidence collected through patient interview. We aim to develop an objective biologically-based computational tool which aids diagnosis and relies on accessible imaging technologies such as electroencephalography (EEG). To achieve this, we used machine learning techniques and a combination of paradigms designed to elicit prediction errors or Mismatch Negativity (MMN) responses. MMN, an EEG component elicited by unpredictable changes in sequences of auditory stimuli, has previously been shown to be reduced in people with schizophrenia and this is arguably one of the most reproducible neurophysiological markers of schizophrenia. EEG data were acquired from 21 patients with schizophrenia and 22 healthy controls whilst they listened to three auditory oddball paradigms comprising sequences of tones which deviated in 10% of trials from regularly occurring standard tones. Deviant tones shared the same properties as standard tones, except for one physical aspect: 1) duration - the deviant stimulus was twice the duration of the standard; 2) monaural gap - deviants had a silent interval omitted from the standard, or 3) inter-aural timing difference, which caused the deviant location to be perceived as 90° away from the standards. We used multivariate pattern analysis, a machine learning technique implemented in the Pattern Recognition for Neuroimaging Toolbox (PRoNTo) to classify images generated through statistical parametric mapping (SPM) of spatiotemporal EEG data, i.e. event-related potentials measured on the two-dimensional surface of the scalp over time. Using support vector machine (SVM) and Gaussian processes classifiers (GPC), we were able classify individual patients and controls with balanced accuracies of up to 80.48% (

Indexed as

Support Vector MachineAdultAuditory PerceptionBiomarkersElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPattern Recognition, AutomatedSchizophreniaYoung AdultBiomarkersEEGMachine learningMismatch negativitySchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID28560151
PMCPMC5435594
OpenAlexW2950049130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.