Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28560104›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2017

Construct validity and test-retest reliability of the International Fitness Scale (IFIS) in Colombian children and adolescents aged 9-17.9 years: the FUPRECOL study.

Robinson Ramírez-Vélez, Sandra Milena Cruz-Salazar, Myriam Martínez, Eduardo L Cadore, Alicia M Alonso-Martinez, Jorge E Correa-Bautista, Mikel Izquierdo, Francisco B Ortega, Antonio García-Hermoso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Robinson Ramírez-Vélez *Centro de Estudios en Medición de la Actividad Física (CEMA), Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia.
Sandra Milena Cruz-Salazar *Centro de Estudios en Medición de la Actividad Física (CEMA), Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia.
Myriam Martínez *Centro de Estudios en Medición de la Actividad Física (CEMA), Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia.
Eduardo L Cadore *Exercise Research Laboratory, Physical Education School, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Recife, Brazil.
Alicia M Alonso-Martinez *Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Jorge E Correa-BautistaCentro de Estudios en Medición de la Actividad Física (CEMA), Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia.
Mikel IzquierdoDepartment of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Francisco B Ortega *PROFITH "PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity" Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Andalucia, Spain.
Antonio García-Hermoso *Laboratorio de Ciencias de la Actividad Física, el Deporte y la Salud, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a lack of instruments and studies written in Spanish evaluating physical fitness, impeding the determination of the current status of this important health indicator in the Latin population, especially in Colombia. The aim of the study was two-fold: to examine the validity of the International Fitness Scale (IFIS) with a population-based sample of schoolchildren from Bogota, Colombia and to examine the reliability of the IFIS with children and adolescents from Engativa, Colombia.

methodsThe sample comprised 1,873 Colombian youths (54.5% girls) aged 9-17.9 years. We measured their adiposity markers (waist-to-height ratio, skinfold thickness, percentage of body fat and body mass index), blood pressure, lipids profile, fasting glucose, and physical fitness level (self-reported and measured). A validated cardiometabolic risk index score was also used. An age- and sex-matched subsample of 229 schoolchildren who were not originally included in the sample completed the IFIS twice for reliability purposes.

resultsOur data suggest that both measured and self-reported overall physical fitness levels were inversely associated with percentage of body fat indicators and the cardiometabolic risk index score. Overall, schoolchildren who self-reported "good" or "very good" fitness had better measured fitness levels than those who reported "very poor/poor" fitness (all DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that self-reported fitness, as assessed by the IFIS, is a valid, reliable, and health-related measure. Furthermore, it can be a good alternative for future use in large studies with Latin schoolchildren from Colombia.

Indexed as

ChildPhysical fitnessRisk factorsSelf-reportSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28560104
PMCPMC5444366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.