Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28559921›Full record

ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2017

The gene family-free median of three.

Daniel Doerr, Metin Balaban, Pedro Feijão, Cedric Chauve

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Family-Free Genome Comparison.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel DoerrSchool of Computer and Communication Sciences, EPFL, INJ211 Station 14, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3720-6227
Metin BalabanSchool of Computer and Communication Sciences, EPFL, INJ211 Station 14, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pedro FeijãoFaculty of Technology and Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Cedric ChauveDepartment of Mathematics, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6 Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gene family-free framework for comparative genomics aims at providing methods for gene order analysis that do not require prior gene family assignment, but work directly on a sequence similarity graph. We study two problems related to the breakpoint median of three genomes, which asks for the construction of a fourth genome that minimizes the sum of breakpoint distances to the input genomes.

methodsWe present a model for constructing a median of three genomes in this family-free setting, based on maximizing an objective function that generalizes the classical breakpoint distance by integrating sequence similarity in the score of a gene adjacency. We study its computational complexity and we describe an integer linear program (ILP) for its exact solution. We further discuss a related problem called

resultsThe developed methods compute accurate positional orthologs for genomes comparable in size of bacterial genomes on simulated data and genomic data acquired from the OMA orthology database. In particular, FFAdj-AM performs equally or better when compared to the well-established gene family prediction tool MultiMSOAR.

conclusionsWe study the computational complexity of a new family-free model and present algorithms for its solution. With FFAdj-AM, we propose an appealing alternative to established tools for identifying higher confidence positional orthologs.

Indexed as

Breakpoint medianFamily-free genome comparisonPositional orthology

Identifiers

PMID28559921
PMCPMC5446766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.