ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2017
EEG and Eye Tracking Signatures of Target Encoding during Structured Visual Search.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping neural activity during naturalistic visual and memory search.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Fixation-related potentials during a virtual navigation task: The influence of image statistics on early cortical processing.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Synchronization-based fusion of EEG and eye blink signals for enhanced decoding accuracy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cognitive workload estimation using physiological measures: a review.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- The use of the eye-fixation-related potential to investigate visual perception in professional domains with high attentional demand: a literature review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Review
- Objective assessment of cognitive fatigue: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Joint Analysis of Eye Blinks and Brain Activity to Investigate Attentional Demand during a Visual Search Task.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Eye Fixation-Related Potentials during Visual Search on Acquaintance and Newly-Learned Faces.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Alexithymia Is Associated With Deficits in Visual Search for Emotional Faces in Clinical Depression.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Challenges and Opportunities in Consumer Neuroergonomics.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2021Article
- Abstract goal representation in visual search by neurons in the human pre-supplementary motor area.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2019Article
- Target probability modulates fixation-related potentials in visual search.Biological psychology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
EEG and eye tracking variables are potential sources of information about the underlying processes of target detection and storage during visual search. Fixation duration, pupil size and event related potentials (ERPs) locked to the onset of fixation or saccade (saccade-related potentials, SRPs) have been reported to differ dependent on whether a target or a non-target is currently fixated. Here we focus on the question of whether these variables also differ between targets that are subsequently reported (hits) and targets that are not (misses). Observers were asked to scan 15 locations that were consecutively highlighted for 1 s in pseudo-random order. Highlighted locations displayed either a target or a non-target stimulus with two, three or four targets per trial. After scanning, participants indicated which locations had displayed a target. To induce memory encoding failures, participants concurrently performed an aurally presented math task (high load condition). In a low load condition, participants ignored the math task. As expected, more targets were missed in the high compared with the low load condition. For both conditions, eye tracking features distinguished better between hits and misses than between targets and non-targets (with larger pupil size and shorter fixations for missed compared with correctly encoded targets). In contrast, SRP features distinguished better between targets and non-targets than between hits and misses (with average SRPs showing larger P300 waveforms for targets than for non-targets). Single trial classification results were consistent with these averages. This work suggests complementary contributions of eye and EEG measures in potential applications to support search and detect tasks. SRPs may be useful to monitor what objects are relevant to an observer, and eye variables may indicate whether the observer should be reminded of them later.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.