Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28559383›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Spatial Processing Is Frequency Specific in Auditory Cortex But Not in the Midbrain.

Joseph Sollini, Robert Mill, Christian J Sumner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Binaural fusion: Complexities in definition and measurement.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Activity in Human Auditory Cortex Represents Spatial Separation Between Concurrent Sounds.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph SolliniMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom christian.sumner2@nottingham.ac.uk j.sollini@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1974-4291
Robert MillMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0643-6134
Christian J SumnerMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom christian.sumner2@nottingham.ac.uk j.sollini@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2573-7418

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U135097127Medical Research Council MC_UU_00010/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cochlea behaves like a bank of band-pass filters, segregating information into different frequency channels. Some aspects of perception reflect processing within individual channels, but others involve the integration of information across them. One instance of this is sound localization, which improves with increasing bandwidth. The processing of binaural cues for sound location has been studied extensively. However, although the advantage conferred by bandwidth is clear, we currently know little about how this additional information is combined to form our percept of space. We investigated the ability of cells in the auditory system of guinea pigs to compare interaural level differences (ILDs), a key localization cue, between tones of disparate frequencies in each ear. Cells in auditory cortex believed to be integral to ILD processing (excitatory from one ear, inhibitory from the other: EI cells) compare ILDs separately over restricted frequency ranges which are not consistent with their monaural tuning. In contrast, cells that are excitatory from both ears (EE cells) show no evidence of frequency-specific processing. Both cell types are explained by a model in which ILDs are computed within separate frequency channels and subsequently combined in a single cortical cell. Interestingly, ILD processing in all inferior colliculus cell types (EE and EI) is largely consistent with processing within single, matched-frequency channels from each ear. Our data suggest a clear constraint on the way that localization cues are integrated: cortical ILD tuning to broadband sounds is a composite of separate, frequency-specific, binaurally sensitive channels. This frequency-specific processing appears after the level of the midbrain.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory CortexFemaleGuinea PigsMaleMesencephalonNerve NetPitch DiscriminationSound LocalizationSpace Perceptionauditory cortexfrequency specificityinferior colliculussound localization

Identifiers

PMID28559383
PMCPMC5511886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.