Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28559325›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Input timing for spatial processing is precisely tuned via constant synaptic delays and myelination patterns in the auditory brainstem.

Annette Stange-Marten, Alisha L Nabel, James L Sinclair, Matthew Fischl, Olga Alexandrova, Hilde Wohlfrom, Conny Kopp-Scheinpflug, Michael Pecka, Benedikt Grothe

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Fast Inhibition Slows and Desynchronizes Mouse Auditory Efferent Neuron Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Experience-Dependent Plasticity in Nucleus Laminaris of the Barn Owl.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Auditory brainstem development and plasticity.Current opinion in physiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Synaptic Inhibition of Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Neurons by Neurons of the Medial Nucleus of the Trapezoid Body.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annette Stange-MartenDivision of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Alisha L NabelDivision of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
James L SinclairDivision of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Matthew FischlDivision of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7679-9347
Olga AlexandrovaDivision of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Hilde WohlfromDivision of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Conny Kopp-ScheinpflugDivision of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Michael PeckaDivision of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany; grothe@lmu.de pecka@bio.lmu.de.
Benedikt GrotheDivision of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany; grothe@lmu.de pecka@bio.lmu.de.
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise timing of synaptic inputs is a fundamental principle of neural circuit processing. The temporal precision of postsynaptic input integration is known to vary with the computational requirements of a circuit, yet how the timing of action potentials is tuned presynaptically to match these processing demands is not well understood. In particular, action potential timing is shaped by the axonal conduction velocity and the duration of synaptic transmission delays within a pathway. However, it is not known to what extent these factors are adapted to the functional constraints of the respective circuit. Here, we report the finding of activity-invariant synaptic transmission delays as a functional adaptation for input timing adjustment in a brainstem sound localization circuit. We compared axonal and synaptic properties of the same pathway between two species with dissimilar timing requirements (gerbil and mouse): In gerbils (like humans), neuronal processing of sound source location requires exceptionally high input precision in the range of microseconds, but not in mice. Activity-invariant synaptic transmission and conduction delays were present exclusively in fast conducting axons of gerbils that also exhibited unusual structural adaptations in axon myelination for increased conduction velocity. In contrast, synaptic transmission delays in mice varied depending on activity levels, and axonal myelination and conduction velocity exhibited no adaptations. Thus, the specializations in gerbils and their absence in mice suggest an optimization of axonal and synaptic properties to the specific demands of sound localization. These findings significantly advance our understanding of structural and functional adaptations for circuit processing.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory PathwaysBrain StemCochlear NucleusFemaleGerbillinaeHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred CBAMyelin SheathNeural ConductionSound LocalizationSpatial ProcessingSynaptic TransmissionTime Factorscircuit processinginput timingmyelinationsound localizationsynaptic transmission delay

Identifiers

PMID28559325
PMCPMC5474802
OpenAlexW2618691108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.