ArticleBMC medical ethics2017
A 14-day limit for bioethics: the debate over human embryo research.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- The proteomic landscape and temporal dynamics of human and mouse gastruloid development.Nature cell biology · 2026Article
- Stem cell-based embryo models as a tool for reproductive biology.Molecular human reproduction · 2026Review
- Morally relevant features warranting ethical oversight in human stem cell-based embryo models.Nature cell biology · 2026Review
- A biological and ethical assessment of whether humans could or should reproduce in space.NPJ microgravity · 2025Review
- Artificial Uterus and Artificial Embryos: Unsolved Tasks.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025Review
- Stem Cell and Synthetic Embryo Models: Advances, Applications, and Ethical Considerations.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2025Review
- The beginning of becoming a human.Aging · 2024Review
- 'Ceci n'est pas un embryon?' The ethics of human embryo model research.Nature methods · 2023Article
- Derivation of Human Extraembryonic Mesoderm-like Cells from Primitive Endoderm.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Grave-to-cradle: human embryonic lineage tracing from the postmortem body.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2023Review
- Gastruloids: Pluripotent stem cell models of mammalian gastrulation and embryo engineering.Developmental biology · 2022Article
- Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China†.Biology of reproduction · 2022Article
- 100 plus years of stem cell research-20 years of ISSCR.Stem cell reports · 2022Review
- Recreating Tissue Structures Representative of Teratomas In Vitro Using a Combination of 3D Cell Culture Technology and Human Embryonic Stem Cells.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Are we ready for the revision of the 14-day rule? Implications from Chinese legislations guiding human embryo and embryoid research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- The path toward ectogenesis: looking beyond the technical challenges.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- The ethics of human-embryoids model: a call for consistency.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2021Review
- The new Japanese regulation on human/non-human chimeras: should we worry?JBRA assisted reproduction · 2021Article
- Using Advanced Cell Culture Techniques to Differentiate Pluripotent Stem Cells and Recreate Tissue Structures Representative of Teratoma Xenografts.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Rethinking Human Embryo Research Policies.The Hastings Center report · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis article explores the reasons in favour of revising and extending the current 14-day statutory limit to maintaining human embryos in culture. This limit is enshrined in law in over a dozen countries, including the United Kingdom. In two recently published studies (2016), scientists have shown that embryos can be sustained in vitro for about 13 days after fertilisation. Positive reactions to these results have gone hand in hand with calls for revising the 14-day rule, which only allows embryo research until the 14th day after fertilisation. MAIN TEXT: The article explores the most prominent arguments in favour of and against the extension of the 14-day limit for conducting research on human embryos. It situates these arguments within the history of the 14-day limit. I start by discussing the history of the 14-day limit in the United Kingdom and the reasons behind the decision to opt for a compromise between competing moral views. I then analyse the arguments that those who are generally in favour of embryo research put forward in support of extending the 14-day rule, namely (a) the argument of the beneficence of research and (b) the argument of technical feasibility (further explained in the article). I then show how these two arguments played a role in the recent approval of two novel techniques for the replacement of faulty mitochondrial DNA in the United Kingdom. Despite the popularity and widespread use of these arguments, I argue that they are ultimately problematic and should not be straightforwardly accepted (i.e. accepted without further scrutiny). I end by making a case for respecting value pluralism in the context of embryo research, and I present two reasons in favour of respecting value pluralism: the argument of public trust and the argument of democracy.
conclusionI argue that 14-day limit for embryo research is not a valuable tool despite being a solution of compromise, but rather because of it. The importance of respecting value pluralism (and of respecting different views on embryo research) needs to be considered in any evaluation concerning a potential change to the 14-day rule.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.