Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28558741›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2017

Brain-Computer Interface application: auditory serial interface to control a two-class motor-imagery-based wheelchair.

Ricardo Ron-Angevin, Francisco Velasco-Álvarez, Álvaro Fernández-Rodríguez, Antonio Díaz-Estrella, María José Blanca-Mena, Francisco Javier Vizcaíno-Martín

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of 3D paradigm synchronous motion for SSVEP-based hybrid BCI-VR system.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ricardo Ron-AngevinDepartment of Electronic Technology, University of Málaga, 29071, Málaga, Spain. rron@uma.es.
Francisco Velasco-ÁlvarezDepartment of Electronic Technology, University of Málaga, 29071, Málaga, Spain.
Álvaro Fernández-RodríguezDepartment of Electronic Technology, University of Málaga, 29071, Málaga, Spain.
Antonio Díaz-EstrellaDepartment of Electronic Technology, University of Málaga, 29071, Málaga, Spain.
María José Blanca-MenaDepartment of Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, University of Málaga, 29071, Málaga, Spain.
Francisco Javier Vizcaíno-MartínDepartment of Electronic Technology, University of Málaga, 29071, Málaga, Spain.
Universidad de Málaga · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCertain diseases affect brain areas that control the movements of the patients' body, thereby limiting their autonomy and communication capacity. Research in the field of Brain-Computer Interfaces aims to provide patients with an alternative communication channel not based on muscular activity, but on the processing of brain signals. Through these systems, subjects can control external devices such as spellers to communicate, robotic prostheses to restore limb movements, or domotic systems. The present work focus on the non-muscular control of a robotic wheelchair.

methodA proposal to control a wheelchair through a Brain-Computer Interface based on the discrimination of only two mental tasks is presented in this study. The wheelchair displacement is performed with discrete movements. The control signals used are sensorimotor rhythms modulated through a right-hand motor imagery task or mental idle state. The peculiarity of the control system is that it is based on a serial auditory interface that provides the user with four navigation commands. The use of two mental tasks to select commands may facilitate control and reduce error rates compared to other endogenous control systems for wheelchairs.

resultsSeventeen subjects initially participated in the study; nine of them completed the three sessions of the proposed protocol. After the first calibration session, seven subjects were discarded due to a low control of their electroencephalographic signals; nine out of ten subjects controlled a virtual wheelchair during the second session; these same nine subjects achieved a medium accuracy level above 0.83 on the real wheelchair control session.

conclusionThe results suggest that more extensive training with the proposed control system can be an effective and safe option that will allow the displacement of a wheelchair in a controlled environment for potential users suffering from some types of motor neuron diseases.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesWheelchairsAdultBrainFemaleHumansMaleRoboticsAuditory interfaceBrain–Computer Interface (BCI)Brain-Controlled Wheelchair (BCW)Motor imagery (MI) taskSerialTwo-class

Identifiers

PMID28558741
PMCPMC5450066
OpenAlexW2619514794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.