Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28558392›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2016

Illumination discrimination in real and simulated scenes.

Ana Radonjic, Bradley Pearce, Stacey Aston, Avery Krieger, Hilary Dubin, Nicolas P Cottaris, David H Brainard, Anya C Hurlbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Color constancy for daylight illumination changes in anomalous trichromats and dichromats.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Discrimination of spectral reflectance under environmental illumination.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana RadonjicDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USAradonjic@sas.upenn.eduhttp://www.sas.upenn.edu/~radonjic/.
Bradley PearceInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKbradmpearce@gmail.com.
Stacey AstonInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKstacey.aston1@newcastle.ac.ukhttps://staceyaston.com/.
Avery KriegerDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USAavekrieger@gmail.com.
Hilary DubinDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USAhdubin@sas.upenn.edu.
Nicolas P CottarisDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USAcottaris@sas.upenn.eduhttps://color.psych.upenn.edu/people/nicolas-p-cottaris.
David H BrainardDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USAbrainard@psych.upenn.eduhttps://color.psych.upenn.edu/people/brainard.
Anya C HurlbertInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKanya.hurlbert@newcastle.ac.ukhttp://www.ncl.ac.uk/ion/staff/profile/anyahurlbert.html.

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Geoffrey Karl Aguirre · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
COLOR CONSTANCY--REAL IMAGES AND EARLY VISUAL MECHANISMSR01EY010016 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BRAINARD, DAVID H. · 1998 to 2018
$5.4M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010016Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 102562/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterizing humans' ability to discriminate changes in illumination provides information about the visual system's representation of the distal stimulus. We have previously shown that humans are able to discriminate illumination changes and that sensitivity to such changes depends on their chromatic direction. Probing illumination discrimination further would be facilitated by the use of computer-graphics simulations, which would, in practice, enable a wider range of stimulus manipulations. There is no a priori guarantee, however, that results obtained with simulated scenes generalize to real illuminated scenes. To investigate this question, we measured illumination discrimination in real and simulated scenes that were well-matched in mean chromaticity and scene geometry. Illumination discrimination thresholds were essentially identical for the two stimulus types. As in our previous work, these thresholds varied with illumination change direction. We exploited the flexibility offered by the use of graphics simulations to investigate whether the differences across direction are preserved when the surfaces in the scene are varied. We show that varying the scene's surface ensemble in a manner that also changes mean scene chromaticity modulates the relative sensitivity to illumination changes along different chromatic directions. Thus, any characterization of sensitivity to changes in illumination must be defined relative to the set of surfaces in the scene.

Indexed as

LightingAdultColor PerceptionComputer GraphicsComputer SimulationContrast SensitivityFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28558392
PMCPMC5024666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.