Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28557999›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Treatment of AKI in developing and developed countries: An international survey of pediatric dialysis modalities.

Rupesh Raina, Abigail M Chauvin, Timothy Bunchman, David Askenazi, Akash Deep, Michael J Ensley, Vinod Krishnappa, Sidharth Kumar Sethi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Is SLED Efficient in Sepsis Associated Acute Kidney Injury: Hope but Hold!!Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Paediatric nephrology in under-resourced areas.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Pediatric acute kidney injury: new advances in the last decade.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Rupesh RainaDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio, United States of America.
Abigail M ChauvinNortheast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, United States.
Timothy BunchmanChildren's Hospital of Richmond, VCU School of Medicine, Virginia, United States of America.
David AskenaziDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.
Akash DeepKing's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, United Kingdom.
Michael J EnsleyDepartment of Political Science, Kent State University, Kent, OH, United States of America.
Vinod KrishnappaDepartment of Nephrology, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, OH, United States of America.
Sidharth Kumar SethiKidney Institute, Medanta, The Medicity Hospital, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Cleveland Clinic · USChildren's Hospital of Richmond at VCU · USKent State University · USKing's College Hospital · GBMedanta The Medicity · INNortheast Ohio Medical University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

hypothesisAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a pediatric incidence ranging from 19.3% to 24.1%. Treatment of pediatric AKI is a source of debate in varying geographical regions. Currently CRRT is the treatment for pediatric AKI, but limitations due to cost and accessibility force use of adult equipment and other therapeutic options such as peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD). It was hypothesized that more cost-effective measures would likely be used in developing countries due to lesser resource availability.

methodsA 26-question internet-based survey was distributed to 650 pediatric Nephrologists. There was a response rate of 34.3% (223 responses). The survey was distributed via pedneph and pcrrt email servers, inquiring about demographics, technology, resources, pediatric-specific supplies, and preference in renal replacement therapy (RRT) in pediatric AKI. The main method of analysis was to compare responses about treatments between nephrologists in developed countries and nephrologists in developing countries using difference-of-proportions tests.

resultsPD was available in all centers surveyed, while HD was available in 85.1% and 54.1% (p = 0.00), CRRT was available in 60% and 33.3% (p = 0.001), and SLED was available in 20% and 25% (p = 0.45) centers of developed and developing world respectively. In developing countries, 68.5% (p = 0.000) of physicians preferred PD to costlier therapies, while in developed countries it was found that physicians favored HD (72%, p = 0.00) or CRRT (24%, p = 0.041) in infants.

conclusionsLack of availability of resources, trained physicians and funds often preclude standards of care in developing countries, and there is much development needed in terms of meeting higher global standards for treating pediatric AKI patients. PD remains the main modality of choice for treatment of AKI in infants in developing world.

Indexed as

Developed CountriesDeveloping CountriesAcute Kidney InjuryChildHumansRenal DialysisSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28557999
PMCPMC5448754
OpenAlexW2617560919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.