ArticlePLoS computational biology2017
On the effects of alternative optima in context-specific metabolic model predictions.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling with Machine Learning Improves Gene Essentiality Prediction in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Finding Multiple Optimal Solutions to an Integer Linear Program by Random Perturbations of Its Objective Function.Algorithms · 2025Article
- A strategy to detect metabolic changes induced by exposure to chemicals from large sets of condition-specific metabolic models computed with enumeration techniques.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Guidelines for extracting biologically relevant context-specific metabolic models using gene expression data.Metabolic engineering · 2023Article
- Maximization of non-idle enzymes improves the coverage of the estimated maximal in vivo enzyme catalytic rates in Escherichia coli.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- DEXOM: Diversity-based enumeration of optimal context-specific metabolic networks.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- The Contribution of Metabolomics to Systems Biology: Current Applications Bridging Genotype and Phenotype in Plant Science.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- SWIFTCORE: a tool for the context-specific reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Medusa: Software to build and analyze ensembles of genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Mechanistic insights into bacterial metabolic reprogramming from omics-integrated genome-scale models.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2020Article
- Advances in metabolic flux analysis toward genome-scale profiling of higher organisms.Bioscience reports · 2018Review
- Resolving the central metabolism of Arabidopsis guard cells.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of experimental data into genome-scale metabolic models can greatly improve flux predictions. This is achieved by restricting predictions to a more realistic context-specific domain, like a particular cell or tissue type. Several computational approaches to integrate data have been proposed-generally obtaining context-specific (sub)models or flux distributions. However, these approaches may lead to a multitude of equally valid but potentially different models or flux distributions, due to possible alternative optima in the underlying optimization problems. Although this issue introduces ambiguity in context-specific predictions, it has not been generally recognized, especially in the case of model reconstructions. In this study, we analyze the impact of alternative optima in four state-of-the-art context-specific data integration approaches, providing both flux distributions and/or metabolic models. To this end, we present three computational methods and apply them to two particular case studies: leaf-specific predictions from the integration of gene expression data in a metabolic model of Arabidopsis thaliana, and liver-specific reconstructions derived from a human model with various experimental data sources. The application of these methods allows us to obtain the following results: (i) we sample the space of alternative flux distributions in the leaf- and the liver-specific case and quantify the ambiguity of the predictions. In addition, we show how the inclusion of ℓ1-regularization during data integration reduces the ambiguity in both cases. (ii) We generate sets of alternative leaf- and liver-specific models that are optimal to each one of the evaluated model reconstruction approaches. We demonstrate that alternative models of the same context contain a marked fraction of disparate reactions. Further, we show that a careful balance between model sparsity and metabolic functionality helps in reducing the discrepancies between alternative models. Finally, our findings indicate that alternative optima must be taken into account for rendering the context-specific metabolic model predictions less ambiguous.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.