Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28557831›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in obstetrics & gynecology2017

Female exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals and fecundity: a review.

Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón, Audrey J Gaskins

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03733912 (To Investigate the Effect of Plasticizers on the Pregnancy in Vitro Fertilization Cycles), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03733912 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

To Investigate the Effect of Plasticizers on the Pregnancy in Vitro Fertilization Cycles

TypeobservationalSponsorKaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.Ran2018 to 2020Enrolled80ConditionsFertilization in VitroArmsPhthalate metabolites measurement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Association of triclosan and human infertility: A systematic review.Environmental analysis, health and toxicology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Environmental factors in declining human fertility.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Evaluation of Triclosan Effects on Cultured Swine Luteal Cells.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Association Between the Frequency of Eating Non-home-prepared Meals and Women Infertility in the United States.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lidia Mínguez-AlarcónaDepartment of Environmental Health bDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health cChanning Division of Network Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Audrey J Gaskins
Harvard University · US

Funding

PCBs, Phthalates and Male Reproductive HealthR01ES009718 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI HAUSER, RUSS B · 1999 to 2018
$11.6M
Maternal Exposure to Air Pollution and Early Pregnancy OutcomesK99ES026648 · NIEHS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI GASKINS, AUDREY JANE · 2017 to 2018
$246k
NICHD NIH HHS L50 HD085359NIEHS NIH HHS K99 ES026648NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES009718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewEndocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) have been known for their ability to interfere with aspects of hormone action resulting in adverse health consequences among animals and humans; however, the effects of EDCs on human fecundity have shown inconsistent findings. This review summarizes the most recent epidemiologic literature from humans on the potential effects of female exposure to nonpersistent EDCs, specifically bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates, parabens, and triclosan, on fecundity, measured by markers of reproductive hormones, markers of ovulation or ovarian reserve, IVF outcomes, and time-to-pregnancy. RECENT

findingsAlthough the epidemiologic literature on this topic is growing, the evidence supporting an association between female urinary concentrations of BPA, phthalates, parabens and triclosan, and fecundity remains unclear. The heterogeneous results could be due to methodological differences in recruitment populations (fertile vs. subfertile), study designs (prospective vs. retrospective), assessment of exposure (including differences in the number and timing of urine samples and differences in the analytical methods used to assess the urinary concentrations), residual confounding due to diet or other lifestyle factors, and coexposures to other chemicals. SUMMARY: At present, there is limited evidence to conclude that female exposure to nonpersistent EDCs affect fecundity in humans. Further studies focusing on exposure to mixtures of EDCs are needed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzhydryl CompoundsBisphenol A CompoundsEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental ExposureFemaleFertilityFertilization in VitroHormonesHumansParabensPhenolsPhthalic AcidsTriclosanBenzhydryl Compoundsbisphenol ABisphenol A CompoundsEndocrine DisruptorsHormonesParabensPhenolsphthalic acidPhthalic AcidsTriclosan

Identifiers

PMID28557831
PMCPMC5551432
OpenAlexW2619508453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.