Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28557720›Full record

Trial reportPediatrics2017

A Family-Centered Rounds Checklist, Family Engagement, and Patient Safety: A Randomized Trial.

Elizabeth D Cox, Gwen C Jacobsohn, Victoria P Rajamanickam, Pascale Carayon, Michelle M Kelly, Tosha B Wetterneck, Paul J Rathouz, Roger L Brown

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Using consumer engagement strategies to improve healthcare safety for young people: An exploration of the relevance and suitability of current approaches.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Do patient engagement interventions work for all patients? A systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth D CoxDepartments of Pediatrics, ecox@pediatrics.wisc.edu.
Gwen C JacobsohnFamily Medicine and Community Health.
Victoria P RajamanickamBiostatistics and Medical Informatics, and.
Pascale CarayonCenter for Quality and Productivity Improvement.
Michelle M KellyDepartments of Pediatrics.
Tosha B WetterneckFamily Medicine and Community Health.
Paul J RathouzBiostatistics and Medical Informatics, and.
Roger L BrownDepartment of Research Design and Statistics, School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
Engaging Families in Bedside Rounds to Promote Pediatric Patient SafetyR18HS018680 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI COX, ELIZABETH D. · 2010 to 2014
$2.4M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS018680NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesFamily-centered rounds (FCRs) have become standard of care, despite the limited evaluation of FCRs' benefits or interventions to support high-quality FCR delivery. This work examines the impact of the FCR checklist intervention, a checklist and associated provider training, on performance of FCR elements, family engagement, and patient safety.

methodsThis cluster randomized trial involved 298 families. Two hospital services were randomized to use the checklist; 2 others delivered usual care. We evaluated the performance of 8 FCR checklist elements and family engagement from 673 pre- and postintervention FCR videos and assessed the safety climate with the Children's Hospital Safety Climate Questionnaire. Random effects regression models were used to assess intervention impact.

resultsThe intervention significantly increased the number of FCR checklist elements performed (β = 1.2,

conclusionsThe performance of FCR checklist elements was enhanced by checklist implementation and associated with changes in family engagement and more positive perceptions of safety climate. Implementing the checklist improves delivery of FCRs, impacting quality and safety of care.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyProfessional-Family RelationsChecklistChildChild, PreschoolFamilyFemaleHospitals, PediatricHumansMalePatient Care TeamSurveys and QuestionnairesTeaching Rounds

Identifiers

PMID28557720
PMCPMC5404725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.