Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28557375›Full record

ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2017

Identifying metrics of success for transitional care practices in childhood cancer survivorship: A qualitative study of survivorship providers.

Karim Thomas Sadak, Joseph P Neglia, David R Freyer, Eileen Harwood

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karim Thomas SadakUniversity of Minnesota Masonic Children's Hospital, University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4511-5456
Joseph P NegliaUniversity of Minnesota Masonic Children's Hospital, University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
David R FreyerChildren's Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Eileen HarwoodDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
University of Minnesota Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Fumito Ito · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term survival in childhood cancer is excellent. Most survivors will have a therapy-related chronic condition, yet very few receive survivor-focused care as they transition from adolescence to young adulthood. The purpose of this study is to identify indicators of success in current transitional care practices for young adult survivors of childhood cancer as defined by all members of survivorship care teams. PROCEDURE: An exploratory, phenomenologic qualitative study was conducted with key informants from medical teams involved in transitional care of childhood cancer survivors. Data were collected through phone interviews with providers from both pediatric and adult care settings.

resultsA multidisciplinary study sample of 29 participants from three institutions identified two major themes with multiple subthemes. The first major theme was that providers must be good communicators, and it emphasized the importance of having good relationships throughout the transition of care to optimize effective communication. The second major theme was that models of care must include well-established partners throughout the healthcare system that promote accessible subspecialty care with streamlined referrals and patient navigation services.

conclusionsFrom the perspective of experienced pediatric- and adult-centered providers at three different institutions delivering life-long transitional care for childhood cancer survivors, the optimal model of care must be built around facilitating communication among all key stakeholders and emphasizing patient-friendly services that minimize patient stressors.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareSurvivorsTransitional CareChildCommunicationHumansNeoplasmsProfessional PracticePrognosisQualitative ResearchStandard of Carequalitativesurvivortransition

Identifiers

PMID28557375
PMCPMC7514882
OpenAlexW2619115006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.