Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28557315›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2018

Salience network response to changes in emotional expressions of others is heightened during early adolescence: relevance for social functioning.

Maya L Rosen, Margaret A Sheridan, Kelly A Sambrook, Meg J Dennison, Jessica L Jenness, Mary K Askren, Andrew N Meltzoff, Katie A McLaughlin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gestational PBDE concentrations and functional connectivity in adolescents: The HOME Study.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2026
    Article
  7. Loneliness and self-concept in the relations between Theory of Mind and social anhedonia in adolescents.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maya L RosenDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Margaret A SheridanDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kelly A SambrookDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Meg J DennisonDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jessica L JennessDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mary K AskrenDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andrew N MeltzoffDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Katie A McLaughlinDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterU54HD083091 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GURALNICK, MICHAEL J · 2014 to 2019
$7.9M
Child Trauma and the Development of Neural Systems Underlying Emotion RegulationR01MH103291 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MCLAUGHLIN, KATIE · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
Deprivation and Threat: Dimensions of Early Experience and Neural DevelopmentR01MH106482 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MCLAUGHLIN, KATIE · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Long-Term Memory-Guided Attention: Development, Environmental Factors, and Neural UnderpinningsF32HD089514 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ROSEN, MAYA · 2017 to 2019
$192k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD089514NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083091NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103291NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence is a unique developmental period when the salience of social and emotional information becomes particularly pronounced. Although this increased sensitivity to social and emotional information has frequently been considered with respect to risk behaviors and psychopathology, evidence suggests that increased adolescent sensitivity to social and emotional cues may confer advantages. For example, greater sensitivity to shifts in the emotions of others is likely to promote flexible and adaptive social behavior. In this study, a sample of 54 children and adolescents (age 8-19 years) performed a delayed match-to-sample task for emotional faces while undergoing fMRI scanning. Recruitment of the anterior cingulate and anterior insula when the emotion of the probe face did not match the emotion held in memory followed a quadratic developmental pattern that peaked during early adolescence. These findings indicate meaningful developmental variation in the neural mechanisms underlying sensitivity to changes in the emotional expressions. Across all participants, greater activation of this network for changes in emotional expression was associated with less social anxiety and fewer social problems. These results suggest that the heightened salience of social and emotional information during adolescence may confer important advantages for social behavior, providing sensitivity to others' emotions that facilitates flexible social responding.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionInterpersonal RelationsAdolescentCerebral CortexChildCuesEmotionsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory

Identifiers

PMID28557315
PMCPMC5709230
OpenAlexW2618714740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.