Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28556962›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2017

Treatment of spontaneous preterm labour with retosiban: a phase II pilot dose-ranging study.

Steven Thornton, Guillermo Valenzuela, Charlotte Baidoo, Michael J Fossler, Timothy H Montague, Linda Clayton, Marcy Powell, Jerry Snidow, Brendt Stier, David Soergel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00404768 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose Ranging Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of GSK221149A Administered Intravenously and to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics of GSK221149A Administered Orally to Healthy, Pregnant Females With Uncomplicated Pre-term Labor Between 300/7 and 356/7 Weeks' Gestation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00404768 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose Ranging Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of GSK221149A Administered Intravenously and to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics of GSK221149A Administered Orally to Healthy, Pregnant Females With Uncomplicated Pre-term Labor Between 300/7 and 356/7 Weeks' Gestation

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2007 to 2011Enrolled93ConditionsObstetric Labour, PrematureArmsGSK221149A, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tocolytics for delaying preterm birth: a network meta-analysis (0924).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Steven ThorntonBarts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7613-0408
Guillermo ValenzuelaArrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, CA, USA.
Charlotte BaidooQuantitative Sciences, GSK, Uxbridge, UK.
Michael J FosslerQuantitative Sciences, GSK, Uxbridge, UK.
Timothy H MontagueQuantitative Sciences, GSK, Uxbridge, UK.
Linda ClaytonGSK, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Marcy PowellGSK, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Jerry SnidowGSK, King of Prussia, PA, USA.
Brendt StierGSK, King of Prussia, PA, USA.
David SoergelGSK, King of Prussia, PA, USA.
DE Technologies (United States) · USQuantitative BioSciences · USResearch Triangle Park Foundation · USArrowhead Regional Medical Center · USQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aims of the present study were to investigate the maternal, fetal and neonatal safety and tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of intravenous (IV) retosiban in pregnant women with spontaneous preterm labour (PTL) between 34

methodsIn parts A and B of a three-part, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study, women were randomized 3:1 (Part A) or 2:1 (Part B) to either 12-h IV retosiban followed by a single dose of oral placebo (R-P) or 12-h IV placebo followed by single-dose oral retosiban (P-R).

resultsA total of 29 women were randomized; 20 to R-P and nine to P-R. An integrated analysis found that adverse events were infrequent in mothers/newborns and consistent with events expected in the population under study or associated with confounding factors. Retosiban was rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with an observed half-life of 1.45 h. Efficacy analyses included 19 women. While not statistically significant, those receiving R-P more frequently achieved uterine quiescence in 6 h (R-P, 63%; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 38, 84; P-R, 43%; 95% CrI: 12, 78) and more achieved a reduction of ≥50% in uterine contractions in 6 h (R-P, 63%; 95% CrI: 38, 84; P-R, 29%; 95% CrI: 4, 64). The number of days to delivery was increased in women receiving R-P (median 26 days for R-P vs. 13 days for P-R).

conclusionsIntravenous retosiban has a favourable safety and tolerability profile and might prolong pregnancies in women with PTL. The study provides the rationale and dosing strategy for further evaluation of the efficacy of retosiban in the treatment of PTL.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHalf-LifeHumansInfant, NewbornObstetric Labor, PrematurePilot ProjectsPiperazinesPregnancyPremature BirthReceptors, OxytocinTocolytic AgentsUterine ContractionGSK221149APiperazinesReceptors, OxytocinTocolytic Agentsbioavailabilitypregnancyrandomized control trial

Identifiers

PMID28556962
PMCPMC5595955
OpenAlexW2621547205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.