Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28556824›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes suggest an increase of Sub-Saharan African ancestry in post-Roman periods.

Verena J Schuenemann, Alexander Peltzer, Beatrix Welte, W Paul van Pelt, Martyna Molak, Chuan-Chao Wang, Anja Furtwängler, Christian Urban, Ella Reiter, Kay Nieselt and 6 more

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sudan's complex genetic admixture history drives adaptation to malaria in Sudanese Copts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Verena J SchuenemannInstitute for Archaeological Sciences, University of Tübingen, 72070 Tübingen, Germany.
Alexander PeltzerIntegrative Transcriptomics, Center for Bioinformatics, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Beatrix WelteInstitute for Archaeological Sciences, University of Tübingen, 72070 Tübingen, Germany.
W Paul van PeltDivision of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, UK.
Martyna MolakMuseum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 00-679 Warsaw, Poland.
Chuan-Chao WangDepartment for Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9628-0307
Anja FurtwänglerInstitute for Archaeological Sciences, University of Tübingen, 72070 Tübingen, Germany.
Christian UrbanInstitute for Archaeological Sciences, University of Tübingen, 72070 Tübingen, Germany.
Ella ReiterInstitute for Archaeological Sciences, University of Tübingen, 72070 Tübingen, Germany.
Kay NieseltIntegrative Transcriptomics, Center for Bioinformatics, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1283-7065
Barbara TeßmannBerlin Society of Anthropology, Ethnology and Prehistory, 10997 Berlin, Germany.
Michael FranckenInstitute for Archaeological Sciences, University of Tübingen, 72070 Tübingen, Germany.
Katerina HarvatiInstitute for Archaeological Sciences, University of Tübingen, 72070 Tübingen, Germany.
Wolfgang HaakDepartment for Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Stephan SchiffelsDepartment for Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1017-9150
Johannes KrauseInstitute for Archaeological Sciences, University of Tübingen, 72070 Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Egypt, located on the isthmus of Africa, is an ideal region to study historical population dynamics due to its geographic location and documented interactions with ancient civilizations in Africa, Asia and Europe. Particularly, in the first millennium BCE Egypt endured foreign domination leading to growing numbers of foreigners living within its borders possibly contributing genetically to the local population. Here we present 90 mitochondrial genomes as well as genome-wide data sets from three individuals obtained from Egyptian mummies. The samples recovered from Middle Egypt span around 1,300 years of ancient Egyptian history from the New Kingdom to the Roman Period. Our analyses reveal that ancient Egyptians shared more ancestry with Near Easterners than present-day Egyptians, who received additional sub-Saharan admixture in more recent times. This analysis establishes ancient Egyptian mummies as a genetic source to study ancient human history and offers the perspective of deciphering Egypt's past at a genome-wide level.

Indexed as

Africa South of the SaharaAnthropologyAsiaCell NucleusDNA, MitochondrialEgyptEuropeGene LibraryGenome, HumanGenotypeGeographyHaplotypesHistory, AncientHumansMummiesPhenotypeDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID28556824
PMCPMC5459999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.